Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Sharjeel Imam vs The State Of Nct Of Delhi on 9 December, 2022

Bench: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Abhay S. Oka

                                                     1

     ITEM NO.33                          COURT NO.2                       SECTION II-C

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 36787/2022

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-10-2022
     in CRLA No. 173/2022 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New
     Delhi)

     SHARJEEL IMAM                                                         Petitioner(s)

                                                VERSUS

     THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.                                      Respondent(s)

     ( IA No.184718/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT and IA No.184719/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA
     No.184717/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP)

     Date : 09-12-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA


     For Petitioner(s)             Mr. Siddharth Dave, Sr. Adv.
                                   Mr. Talib Mustafa, Adv.
                                   Mr. Ahmad Ibrahim, Adv.
                                   Ms. Ayesha Zaidi, Adv.
                                   Mr. Lzafeer Ahmad B. F., AOR
                                   Ms. Raksha Agrawal, Adv.
                                   Mr. Jetiben AO., Adv.
                                   Mr. Kartik Venu, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)

                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

Permission to file SLP is granted. The grievance of the petitioner as a co-accused Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by is that while considering the bail application of ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date: 2022.12.12 18:00:19 IST another co-accused in the impugned order dated Reason:

18.10.2022 observations have been made damaging to 2 the role of the petitioner in the episode.

We have noticed in para 68 of the impugned judgment that the Division Bench has clarified that the observations made in that order will not tantamount to an expression of the opinion on the merits of the case.

However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said observations are in the context of that co-accused’s role albeit observations coming even against the petitioner herein and therefore, we clarify that any observations made in respect of the role of the petitioner in the impugned order would not prejudice the petitioner in any manner whatsoever.

The Special Leave Petition accordingly stands disposed of.

Pending applications stand disposed of.

(ASHA SUNDRIYAL)                                               (POONAM VAID)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                                        COURT MASTER (NSH)