Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Souvik Datta & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 19 September, 2018

Author: Debasish Kar Gupta

Bench: Debasish Kar Gupta

                                           1


1    19.9.18               M.A.T. 1070 of 2018
                           (C.A.N.7283 of 2018)
sn

                           SOUVIK DATTA & ORS.
                              VS.
                          THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.


                          Mr. Sardar Amzad Ali..Sr.Adv.
                          Mr. Asok Banerjee
                          Mr. Debanshu Ghorai
                            ..for the applicants/appellants
                          Mr. Srijan Nayak
                          Ms. Rituparna Maitra
                          Mr. Biplab Das
                          Mr. Ankit Sureka
                              ..for the Election Commission
                          Mr. Raja Saha
                          Mr. Amit Kr. Ghosh
                              ..for the State

                                In re: C.A.N.7283/2018

                          This is an application arising out

               of an appeal, which is preferred against a

               judgement       and    order     dated         August      30,   2018

               passed in an application filed under Article

               226   of   the     Constitution            of      India    in    the

               matter     of    Souvik         Datta      &       Ors.    Vs.    The

               Assistant       Returning          Officer,          Co-operative

               Directorate,       Kolkata         Range       &   Ors.    (In   re:

               W.P.16445(w) of 2018).

                          By virtue of the order impugned to

               this appeal, the above writ application was

               disposed    of        granting      liberty         to    the    writ

               petitioners           to     make          a        comprehensive
                            2


application       raising           all        disputes         covered

under     the    writ   petition                and      even      those

otherwise, within a period of 30 days from

the date of passing the above order.

           There was a further direction upon

the Election Commission also to hear out the

disputes in question upon due notice to all

parties and to pass a reasoned order within a

period of 60 days of making the application,

as aforesaid.

           There     was        also           a     direction           to

display    the     aforesaid         notice           on    a     Notice

Board of the Principal Office of the Society

in a permanent form.

           Drawing        our             attention             towards

Regulation 4 of the West Bengal Co-operative

Election        Commission            Regulations,                     2012

(hereinafter        referred              to        as      the        said

Regulation,      2012),        it    is        submitted          by   Mr.

Sardar    Amzad    Ali,        learned             Senior    Advocate

appearing on behalf of the appellants, that

the function of the Election Commission with

regard to holding the election is restricted
                            3


to those Societies which have members up to

1000. According to Mr. Ali, the Co-operative

Society      in   question      having       more     than      1000

members, the Election Commission was not the

appropriate forum to consider the grievance

of the appellants with regard to the Election

of     "Delegates"       held     on    August       11,     2018.

Drawing           our      attention            towards            a

representation dated July 18, 2018 submitted

to the Election Commission (at pages 121 to

123     of     this     writ      application),            it     is

submitted         by     Mr.Ali        that        though        the

irregularities          relating       to     conducting         the

Election       were     pointed        out    in    the      above

representation          prior     to        holding     of       the

Election in question. The Election Commission

paid no heed to the same. According to Mr.

Ali,    the    Election     Commission         is     bent      upon

violation of law in conducting the Election

in question. Therefore, intervention of the

writ Court was required.

              On the other hand, it is submitted

by     Mr.     Srijan     Nayak,        learned        Advocate
                               4


appearing         on        behalf     of     the      Election

Commission, namely, the respondent nos. 2&3,

that the said regulation has been framed in exercise of power conferred under sub-section 8 of Section 96 of the West Bengal Co- operative Societies Rules, 2016. Under sub- clause (i) of sub-regulation (35) of Regulation 3 of the said regulation, any dispute relating to election of Delegates in any co-operative society should be referred to the Co-operative Election Commission within 30 days from the date of arising of such disputes. According to Mr. Nayak, there was no error and/or irregularities in passing the order impugned to this appeal in view of the aforesaid provisions. It is also submitted by Mr. Nayak, on instruction, from the officer of the respondent nos.2&3, who is present in Court today, that the Election of Board of Directors has already been held in respect of the Co-operative Society in question.

We have heard the learned Counsel 5 appearing for the respective parties at length and we have given our anxious consideration to the facts and circumstances of this case. Admittedly, the said regulation has been framed in exercise of power conferred under sub-section (8) of Section 96 of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 2006. In order to adjudicate the issue involved in this appeal, the provision of Clause (i) of sub-rule(35) of Regulation 3 is quoted below :

"Any dispute relating to election of delegates in any Co-operative society shall be referred to the Co- operative Election Commission within 30 days from the date of arising of such dispute."

There is no doubt or dispute in view of the above provision that in the matter of Election of Delegates, any dispute had to be referred to the Co-operative Election Commission at the first instance within 30 days from the date of arising such disputes.

In view of the above, we do not find any errors and/or irregularities in the order impugned to this appeal.

6

Reliance is placed by Mr. Nayak in the decision of Secretary, West Bengal Co- operative Election Commission Vs. Commissioner, West Bengal Co-operative Election Commission, reported in 2017(2)CHN(CAL)579.

Taking into consideration the decision of this Court in Secretary, West Bengal Co-operative Election Commission (Supra), we find support to our above observation that for the purpose of "conduct" of all election to a registered co-operative Society in West Bengal, superintendence, direction and control vests squarely with the Co-operative Election Commission and its functionaries, which include, inter-alia, Returning Officers and Assistant Returning officers also.

However, the Court cannot be a mute spectator with regard to the conduct of the Election Commission in the instant case. It is not in dispute that a representation dated July 18, 2018 was submitted before the 7 Commissioner, Co-operative Election Commission, which was followed by two subsequent representations dated August 13, 2018, the Election being held on August 11, 2018.

It is a matter of surprise that while a Court was in seisin of the matter due to pendency of the writ application which gives rise to this appeal (which was affirmed on August 20, 2018), we are appraised of the fact that the Election of the Board of Directors of the Co-operative Society in question took place on September 14, 2018. No material was produced before the Writ Court to show that those representations were duly considered by the Election Commission. Since it was the intention of the legislature that it is within the domain of the State Government to appoint Co-operative Election Commissioner of Election Commission for the purpose of conducting the Election of Co- operative Society, an Election commissioner has been appointed in the State of West 8 Bengal and a delegated legislation by way of framing regulation has been introduced, we should be conscious while passing an order in course of judicial review.

Be that as it may, it will not be overstepping in the instant case to direct the Election Commission to consider the representation which may be submitted by the appellants before it strictly in terms of the order passed in the writ application and to add that the formation/Election of the Board of Directors shall be subject to such decision and till such decision the Election Commission shall ensure that no capital expenditure is incurred by the newly formed Board of Directors, if any, and will only be permitted to incur routine expenses.

We make it clear that liberty granted to the appellants for submitting the representation remains uninterferred with.

Since nothing else remains to be decided in this appeal, this appeal is treated as on day's list and the same is 9 taken up for hearing with the consent of the parties.

The appeal and the application are disposed of with the modification of the order impugned to this appeal to the extent as indicated hereinabove.

There will be, however, no order as to costs.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.

(Debasish Kar Gupta, J.) (Shampa Sarkar, J.) 10 11