Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Shihad A vs Principal on 12 June, 2012

Author: T.R.Ramachandran Nair

Bench: T.R.Ramachandran Nair

       

  

  

 
 
                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                             PRESENT:

                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

                   MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/16TH ASWINA 1934

                                    WP(C).No. 14741 of 2012 (P)
                                       ---------------------------

PETITIONER :
---------------------

             SHIHAD A., AGED 20 YEARS
             S/O. P.A.ABDUL NAZAR, PADINHARAMADAM
             PUNNAPRA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-688 004.

             BY ADV. SRI.A.A.ABUL HASSAN

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------

          1. PRINCIPAL, MODEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE,
              THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI-682 021.

          2. DIRECTOR,
              INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT,
              PRAJOE TOWERS, VAZHUTHACAUD
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014.

              R2 BY SRI.V.A.MOHAMMED, SC, IHRD


            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-10-2012,
            THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:



Mn


                                                                              ...2/-

WP(C).No. 14741 of 2012 (P)


                                 APPENDIX

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

EXHIBIT-P1   A TRUE COPY OF THE PROSPECTUS OF ADMISSION TO NRI SEATS IN
             ENGINEERING COLLEGES UNDER IHRD FOR 2012-2013.

EXHIBIT-P2 - A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 12.6.2012 ISSUED BY THE
             VILLAGE OFFICER, PUNNAPRA.

EXHIBIT-P3 - A TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF REJECTED CANDIDATES OBTAINED BY
             THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT-P4 - COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18.9.2012 SUBMITTED BEFORE
             THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT-P5 - COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD SIGNED BY THE 2ND
             RESPONDENT ON 25.9.2012.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS      :  NIL

                                                              //TRUE COPY//



                                                             P.A. TO JUDGE

Mn



                      T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                       W.P.(C). No.14741/2012-P
                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
              Dated this the 8th day of October, 2012

                                 J U D G M E N T

The writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to direct the first respondent to permit the petitioner to participate in the counselling for B.Tech (Computer Science) under the NRI quota scheduled on 26/06/2012 or on any other subsequent date for the academic year 2012-13.

2. This Court had passed an interim order on 25/06/2012. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that even though the petitioner participated in the counselling, he was not selected in the Model Engineering College at Thrikkakkara. It is further submitted that the petitioner was thereafter granted admission in the College of Engineering at Karunagappally under the Institute of Human Resources Development itself and having come to know that there is a vacancy in Thrikkakkara, he has filed an application as per Ext.P4. It is prayed that the same may be directed to be considered. In Ext.P4, the prayer is to consider him for transfer to Model Engineering College, Thrikkakkara.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the IHRD.

4. There will be a direction to the second respondent to furnish a reply to the petitioner on Ext.P4 after considering various aspects in terms of the regulations within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a W.P.(C). No.14741/2012 -:2:- copy of this Judgment. It is made clear that I have not expressed anything on the merits of the claims of the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

Sd/-

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.) ms