Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Jharkhand High Court

Pancham Singh & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors. on 26 March, 2010

Author: Amareshwar Sahay

Bench: Amareshwar Sahay

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                                     W.P.S. No. 6777 of 2006
          1. Pancham Singh
          2. Madhusudan Prasad.................                                         Petitioners. 
                                            Versus
          1. State of Jharkhand
          2. The   Director,   (Primary   Education),   Human   Resource   Development 
             Department, Ranchi
          3. The District Superintendent of Education, Ranchi
          4. The District Provident Fund Officer, Ranchi ..................Respondents.
                                  ......
       Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amareshwar Sahay
                                  ......
       For the petitioner          : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate
       For the Respondents  : Mr. JC to GP­III
                                  ......

4/26.03.2010

Heard the parties and with their consent this writ application is  being disposed of at this stage itself.

The petitioner no. 1 retired from service on 31/01/2002 whereas  petitioner   no.   2   retired   from   service   on   31/05/2002.   They   have   filed   this  application   for   direction   to   the   respondents   to   pay   interest   on   principal  amount of differences of revised pay scale for the period from 01/01/1971 to  31/03/1973 as per the rate of G.P.F. amount in the light of the order dated  30/04/2003 passed in L.P.A. No. 651 of 2002.

By filing a counter affidavit as per the direction of this Court it is  stated that the amount legally due to the petitioners, has already been paid to  them.

However,   the   learned   counsel   for   the   petitioners   submit   that  petition no. 1 namely, Pancham singh has not been paid the entire amount of  his claim.

Considering   the   facts   stated   above   and   in   view   of   the   fact   that  admittedly the interest amount has already been paid to the petitioners, this  writ petition is being disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner no. 1 that if  he has been left with any other grievance regarding non­payment of his claim,  he   may   represent   the   District   Superintendent   of   Education,   Ranchi  (Respondent no.3)   stating in detail about his claim and grievance alongwith  supporting documents, if any, within a period of two weeks from today. If such  a   representation   is   filed   by   the   petitioner   within   the   aforesaid   period,   the  District Superintendent of Education, Ranchi shall consider the claim of the  petitioner no. 1 and shall pass an appropriate reasoned order in accordance  with   law   within   a   period   of   eight   weeks   from   the   date   of   filing   of   such  application.

With   the   above   observations   and   directions,   this   writ   petition  stands disposed of.

        

                   (Amareshwar Sahay, J) Mukund/­