Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Sujatha Devi R vs Sri Bharathlal Meena on 21 August, 2013

Bench: Mohan.M.Shantanagoudar, B.Sreenivase Gowda

                             -1-




  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

       DATED THIS THE 21st DAY OF AUGUST, 2013

                          PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN .M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

                           AND

   THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA

           CCC. NOs.633-647 OF 2013 (CIVIL)

BETWEEN


  1. SMT SUJATHA DEVI R
     AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
     W/O SRI SATEESHA
     WORKING AS OFFICE ASSISTANT,
     DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,
     G K V K, BANGALORE- 65


  2. SRI N SRINIVASA
     AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
     S/O NANJUNDAPPA
     WORKING AS FARM LABOURER,
     DEPARTMENT OF AGRONOMY,
     UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,
     G K V K, BANGALORE- 65


  3. SRI NARAYANASWAMY K T
     AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
     S/O K L THAMMANNA GOWDA
     WORKING AS LAB/FIELD ASSISTANT,
     DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS,
     UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SICENCES,
     G K V K, BANGALORE- 65
                            -2-


4. SRI S RAJANNA
   AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
   S/O SIDDHAIAH
   WORKING AS LAB/FIELD ASSISTANT,
   DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING &
   ABM,UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SICENCES,
   G K V K, BANGALORE- 65


5. SMT VENKATALAKSHMAMMA
   AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
   W/O NARASIMAIAH
   WORKING AS FARM LABOURER,
   DEPARTMENT OF GENETICS & PLANT BREEDING,
   UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,
   G K V K, BANGALORE- 65


6. SRI PERUMAL
   AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
   S/O MUNISWAMAPPA
   WORKING AS FARM LABOURER,
   DEPARTMENT OF FOREST & ENVIRONMENTAL
   SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL
   SCENCES,G K V K, BANGALORE- 65


7. SRI L NARAYANASWAMY
   AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
   S/O LAKSHMAIAH
   WORKING AS FIELD ASSISTANT,
   A I C R P , SMALL MILLETS,
   UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,
   G K V K ,BANGALORE- 65


8. SRI RAMEGOWDA M
   AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
   S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA
   WORKING AS TECHNICIAN,
   DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING,
   UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL
   SCIENCE,G K V K ,BANGALORE- 65


9. SRI T G SIDDHARAJU
   AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
   S/O SRI GOVINDAPPA
   WORKING AS FARM LABOURER,
   DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING,
                             -3-


   MARKETING & ABM, UNIVERSITY OF AGRICUL-
   TURAL SCIENCES, G K V K, BANGALORE-65


10. SRI BYLAPPA B
   AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
   S/O HANUMANTHARAYAPPA
   WORKING AS FARM LABOURER
   OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER,
   UNIVERISITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,
   G K V K, BANGALORE- 65


11. SMT C JAYAMMA
   AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
   W/O SRI CHINNAPPA
   WORKING AS FARM LABOURER
   HEBBAL CAMPUS,
   UNIVERISITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,
   G K V K, BANGALORE- 65


12. SRI HANUMANTHARAYA
   AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
   S/O SRI NARASIMHAPPA
   WORKING AS FARM LABOURER
   HORTICULTURE DEPARTMENT,
   UNIVERISITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,
   G K V K, BANGALORE- 65


13. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA
   AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
   W/O JANA,
   WORKING AS FARM LABOURER, FARM
   OFFICE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL
   SICENCES, G.K.V.K BANGALORE


14. SRI. ANANTHA
   AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
   S/O MUDDAPPA,
   WORKING AS FARM LABOURER, FARM
   OFFICE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL
   SICENCES, G.K.V.K BANGALORE


15. SRI.NARAYANASWAMY D.M
   AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
   S/O CHIKKAMUNISWAMY,
   WORKING AS FIELD ASSISTANT,FARM
                                -4-


      OFFICE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL
      SICENCES, G.K.V.K BANGALORE            ... COMPLAINANTS

(By Sri P.B. BAJENTRI FOR B.B. BAJENTRI, ADVS.,)


AND


   1. SRI BHARATHLAL MEENA
      PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
      AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT,
      M S BUILDING,
      SACHIVALAYA,
      BANGALORE-560 001


   2. SHRI NANJAPPA H V
      REGISTRAR,
      UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,
      G.K.V.K,
      BENGALURU-560 065


   3. SHRI SANNAVEERAPPANAVAR
      ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER,
      UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES,
      G.K.V.K,
      BANGALORE CITY.                              ..ACCUSED


(By Sri V.S. HEGDE, AGA., FOR R1;
SRI M SRINIVASA, ADV., FOR A2 &A3)

       These CCCs are filed under Sections 11 & 12 of the
Contempt of Courts Act by the complainant praying to
initiate contempt proceedings against the accused for
disobeying the order dated 20.4.2012 passed by this
Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.1164-1178/2012.

     These CCCs coming on for orders, this day, MOHAN
.M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J., made the following:-
                            -5-



                       ORDER

Counter affidavit of accused No.2-Registrar of University of Agricultural Sciences, dated 19.8.2013 is filed along with Annexure-R12. The document at Annexure-R12 contains the list of daily wage workers.

2. Sri Sreenivas, learned advocate appearing for accused Nos.2 and 3 submits that list containing only three pages is produced along with the counter affidavit. He brings to the notice of the Court that the list contains the names of 171 persons. The list at Annexure-R12 is stated to be the first list and the second list will be prepared soon by the Registrar in terms of the order of this Court dated 20.4.2012 passed in WP.Nos.1164-1178/2012.

The counter affidavit as well as the documents are taken on record.

-6-

3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for accused No.1 submits that the list sent by accused No.2-University has reached the State Government on 16.8.2013 and the same is under scrutiny. He also brings to the notice of the Court that this Court in WP.Nos.1164-1178/2012 has granted six months' time to complete the entire process. According to the learned Government Advocate, since the list is received by the State Government on 16.8.2013, they may need at least two months' time to complete the whole exercise.

The aforesaid submissions are recorded. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are dropped, with a direction to accused No.1 to complete the entire exercise as directed by this Court in WP.Nos.1164-1178/2012, disposed of on -7- 20.4.2012, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order.

It is open for the complainants to revive the contempt proceedings by filing separate contempt petition, if need be and in case if this order is violated.

SD/-

JUDGE SD/-

JUDGE *ck/nk-