Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Sajeevan vs The State Of Kerala on 29 September, 2014

Author: P.R. Ramachandra Menon

Bench: P.R.Ramachandra Menon

       

  

   

 
 
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                           PRESENT:

             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

          WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/17TH POUSHA, 1936

                                WP(C).No.33930 of 2014 (M)
                                --------------------------------------

PETITIONERS:
---------------------

1.        SAJEEVAN,S/O.KUNHIAKKAN,AGED 42 YEARS,
          THAZHE PEEDIKAYIL HOUSE,
          CHECKIAD AMSOM DESOM,CHECKIAD P.O,
          VIA PARAKKADAVU,PIN-673509,VATAKARA TALUK,
          KOZHIKODE DISTRICT

2.        VIJEESH,S/O.BHASKARAN,AGED 34 YEARS,
          VALIYA PEEDIKAYIL HOUSE,VELLOR AMSOM DESOM,
          KODANJERI P.O,VIA PURAMERI,PIN-673502,
          VATAKARA TALUK,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

          BOTH THE PETITIONERS REPRESENTED BY THIER POWER OF
          ATTORNEY HOLDER AANDY,S/O.CHATHU,AGED 62 YEARS,
          THAZHE THOTTOLI HOUSE,CHECKIAD AMSOM DESOM,
          CHECKIAD P.O,VIA PARAKKADAVU,PIN-673509,
          VATAKARA TALUK,KOZHIKODE DISTRICT

           BY ADV. SRI.K.DILIP

RESPONDENTS:
-------------------------

1.        THE STATE OF KERALA,
          REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
          LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS DEPARTMENT,
          GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,SECRETARIAT,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2.        LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE,
          NADAPURAM,REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER
          AGRICULTURAL OFFICE,KRISHI BHAVAN,
          NADAPURAM P.O,PIN-673505.

3.        NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
          P.ONADAPURAM,PIN-673506
          KOZHIKODE DISTRICT

           R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.K.C.VINCENT.

          THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
          ON 07-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
          FOLLOWING:
pk

WP(C).No.33930 of 2014 (M)
---------------------------------------

                                          APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------

EXHIBIT P1:TRUE COPY OF THE TITLE DEED NO.2326/2013 OF SRO,
                 NADAPURAM.

EXHIBIT P2:TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE NO.1535/2014
                 ISSUED BY THE V.O NADAPURAM DATED 29-09-2014.

EXHIBIT P3:TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE V.O
                 NADAPURAM DATED 26-08-2014.

EXHIBIT P4:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT
                 DATED 05-12-2014.

EXHIBIT P5:TRUE COPY OFTHE BUILDING TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 3RD
                 RESPONDNET DATED 14-10-2014 TO THE PETITIONERS.

EXHIBIT P6:COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 05-12-2014 IS FILED BEFORE THE
                 2ND RESPONDENT, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE.

EXHIBIT P7:XEROX COPIES OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SITE.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:                             NIL
---------------------------------------


                                                   //TRUE COPY//




                                                   P.S.TO JUDGE


pk



                   P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                      W.P.(C) No. 33930 of 2014
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
               Dated, this the 7th day of January, 2015

                                JUDGMENT

Petitioners have approached this Court with the following prayers :

"i. Issue a writ of mandamus or such other writs directing the 2nd respondent to dispose the Ext. P6 petition submitted by the petitioner to remove the property in question from the data bank.

2. Issue such other reliefs as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper considering the facts and circumstances of the case."

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners will be satisfied, if a direction is given to the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P6 representation preferred by the petitioner for effecting necessary correction in the Data Bank Register within a reasonable time.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

4. Considering the limited nature of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to adjudicate the matter on merits or to W.P.(C) No. 33930 of 2014 : 2 : issue notice to the 3rd respondent for the time being. The Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext. P6 representation, in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and 3rd respondent, after conducting a site inspection, at the earliest, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition before the second respondent for further steps.

Sd/-

P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE) kmd