Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Allahabad High Court

Kailash Vishwakarma vs State Of U.P. And Others on 6 January, 2010

Author: Imtiyaz Murtaza

Bench: Imtiyaz Murtaza

Court No. - 41

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 26759 of 2009

Petitioner :- Kailash Vishwakarma
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Vijay Bahadur Maurya
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate,H.P. Dube

Hon'ble Imtiyaz Murtaza,J.

Hon'ble Shri Kant Tripathi,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. 

for the State and Sri A.P. Pandey holding brief for Sri  H.P.   Dubey   appearing   on   behalf   of   U.P.   Power  Corporation.

We have been taken through the allegations contained  in the F.I.R. and the material on record. 

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that  the   petitioner   is   ready   to   make   payment   of  Rs.1,00,000/­ within fifteen days from today.  Learned   counsel   for   the   Power   Corporation   prays   for  and is allowed two weeks time to file counter affidavit.  Learned A.G.A. may also file counter affidavit within the  same period. Rejoinder affidavit may thereafter be filed  within one week. 

List this case after the expiry of the aforesaid period.  Till next date of listing or till submission of charge sheet  whichever is earlier, the arrest of the petitioner, namely,  Kailash Vishwakarma, who is wanted in case crime No.   1011 of 2009 under sections 135 of the Electricity Act,  P.S. Kotwali City, District  Mirzapur, shall remain stayed  subject to the condition that the petitioner deposits the  above amount within the stipulated period and in case  of default, the benefit of this order will not be extended  to the petitioner. 

However,  it is made  clear  that  this order  will have  no  effect  on  realization  of Electricity charges  due  against  the petitioner and the amount so deposited by him will  be adjusted at the time of final settlement between the  parties. 

Order Date :- 6.1.2010 MTA