Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

The Rajasthan Public Service ... vs Jeevan Lal Meena on 13 May, 2022

Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
              S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 215/2019

The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer, Through Its
Secretary.
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
1.      Jeevan Lal Meena S/o Shri Kuraji, Aged About 36 Years,
        Village Itava, Post Sarera, Tehsil Kherwara, District
        Udaipur.
2.      The    Director,       Primary      Education,          Government    Of
        Rajasthan, Bikaner.
                                                                ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :    Mr. GR Punia Sr. Advocate, assisted
                                by Mr. Rajesh Punia
For Respondent(s)          :    Mr. Pradeep Singh Khichi for Mr.
                                Rakesh Arora



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order 13/05/2022 At the outset, learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the writ petitioner has already been granted relief on the basis of the certificate other than which was under adjudication. He further submits that he may be given liberty to withdraw the writ petition in light of the submissions made in the application (inward no.01/2022), as it is of no consequence now.

Learned Senior Counsel Mr. GR Punia appearing for review petitioner accepts the proposition of the writ petitioner and also submits that the matter may be disposed in the same terms as sought by learned counsel for the writ petitioner. (Downloaded on 13/05/2022 at 09:16:54 PM)

(2 of 2) [WRW-215/2019] In light of the submissions made by learned counsel for the writ petitioner and for the reasons mentioned in the application (inward no.01/2022), the same is allowed.

Accordingly, the judgment passed by this Court on 12.04.2018 is recalled. The writ petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition.

Since the aforesaid application is allowed, therefore, the present review petition and writ petition no.12999/2016 both are disposed of, as the writ petition stands withdrawn.

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

53-Sudheer/-

(Downloaded on 13/05/2022 at 09:16:54 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)