Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Gauhati High Court

Anjuman Kumar Sharma vs The State Of Assam And 6 Ors on 5 May, 2022

                                                                 Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010070772022




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                          Case No. : WP(C)/2596/2022

         ANJUMAN KUMAR SHARMA
         S/O- AMAR DEV SHARMA
         R/O- HOUSE NO. C- 140, BEGUM VIHAR, BEGUMPUR, SULTANPURI, C-
         BLOCK, NORTH WEST DELHI-110086



         VERSUS

         THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS
         REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM,
         HOME DEPARTMENT
         DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06

         2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
         ASSAM
          ULUBARI
          GUWAHATI-07

         3:THE ADDL. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
         ASSAM
          GUWAHATI

         4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
          KAMRUP (R)
         ASSAM
         AMINGAON

         5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
          KAMRUP (R)
         ASSAM

         6:THE ADDL. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
          KAMRUP (R)
                                                                             Page No.# 2/3

             ASSAM

             7:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE
              BOKO POLICE STATION
              KAMRUP (R)
             ASSAM

             8:ASHIF AHMED(APS)

             ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

             KAMRUP (R)
             ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. J I BORBHUIYA

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM

BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY Order 05.05.2022 Heard Mr. JI Borbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Pursuant to order dated 18.04.2022, the learned State counsel has produced status report relating to Boko PS case No. 127/2022. The said report reflects that after registration of the FIR and during investigation statements of different witnesses were recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., some records relevant to the case were requisitioned from the Branch Manager, Bank of Boroda, Chhaygaon Branch, reports were collected from the Branch Manager of the said bank, Secretary of the concerned Gaon Panchayat was asked to verify genuineness of some trade licenses and such report were collected, the place of occurrence was visited and attempts were made to apprehend the accused, Rohul Amin. It further reflects that the Investigating Officer Page No.# 3/3 has issued requisition under Section 91 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner to produce the original documents related to the case, but according to the Investigating Officer, the petitioner has not produced the original till date.

Be that as it may, at this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner wants to go through the status report so as to take further course of action. Such prayer being not objected, is allowed. The learned State counsel shall share with a copy of the status report with the learned counsel for the petitioner.

List this matter on 09.05.2022.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant