Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Yash Bhupendra Thaker vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 21 November, 2018

Author: Sarang V. Kotwal

Bench: B. P. Dharmadhikari, Sarang V. Kotwal

                                                                   1                                                 APL 1058-18.odt-21

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 
                       CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1058 OF 2018


Yash Bhupendra Thaker.                                                         ]           ... Applicant

           Versus

1. The State of Maharashtra,                                                   ]
2. Minu Sushil Pania.                                                          ]           ... Respondents


Mr. Ashwin D. Rana for Applicant.
Mrs. S. D. Shinde, APP for State - Respondent No.1.
Mira A. Kadam for Respondent No.2.
Yash Bhupendra Thaker, Applicant, present in person.
Minu Sushil Pania, Respondent No.2, present in person.


                                                        CORAM :-  B. P. DHARMADHIKARI &
                                                                     SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
                                                        DATE     :-  NOVEMBER 21, 2018


P. C. :-


1.                    Respondent   no.2   is   present   with   her   Counsel.     She   has

tendered an Affidavit expressing desire to withdraw FIR No.304 of 2017 dated 06/12/2017.

2. Petitioner is present with his Counsel.

URS                                                                                                                              1 of 2




     ::: Uploaded on - 22/11/2018                                                   ::: Downloaded on - 23/11/2018 01:19:03 :::
                                                                    2                                                 APL 1058-18.odt-21

3. We find that the FIR is under Sections 354, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC.

4. The Affidavit unequivocally communicates that police was approached in anger and because of some misunderstanding.

5. Accepting the Affidavit, we make Rule absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).





(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)                                                      (B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)




URS                                                                                                                              2 of 2




     ::: Uploaded on - 22/11/2018                                                   ::: Downloaded on - 23/11/2018 01:19:03 :::