Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Shri. Vishnu Narayan Shivpuri vs Cbi on 2 April, 2012

                       Central Information Commission, New Delhi
                             File No.CIC/SM/A/2011/000659
                  Right to Information Act­2005­Under Section  (19)




Date of hearing                        :                                        2 April 2012


Date of decision                       :                                        2 April 2012



Name of the Appellant                  :    Shri Vishnu Narayan Shivpuri,
                                            H­6/3, Paper Mill Colony,
                                            Lucknow.


Name of the Public Authority           :    CPIO, Central Bureau of Investigation,
                                            Anti Corruption Branch, 7,
                                            Naval Kishore Road, Lucknow - 226 001.



        The Appellant was present.

        No one was present on behalf of the Respondent.

Chief Information Commissioner : Shri Satyananda Mishra

2. The   Appellant   was   present   in   the   Lucknow   studio   of   the   NIC.   The  Respondent had sought adjournment of the case only on the last working day.  As per the general policy of the CIC, no such adjournment is ordinarily allowed  and, therefore, we decided to go ahead with the hearing of the case.

3. The Appellant was heard. He had asked some 18 questions relating to a  variety of issues some of these arising out of some two complaints he had sent  on   19   January   and   17   April   2010   addressed   to   the   CVO   of   the   National  CIC/SM/A/2011/000659 Insurance  Company  and  endorsed  both   to   the   CVC  and  the   Director,   CBI.  Many of his queries did not amount to information being in the nature of either  hypothetical questions or seeking the opinion of the CPIO. However, the CPIO  had   provided   some   information.   The   Appellate   Authority   had   endorsed   the  information provided by the CPIO.

4. After carefully considering the facts of the case, we think that it would be  right for the CPIO to provide to the Appellant the photocopy of the entire file in  which his two complaints had been dealt with so that he can find for himself  whatever  the   CBI   had   done  in   his   case.   Therefore,  we  direct   the   CPIO  to  provide   to   the   Appellant  within   10   working  days  of   receiving  this   order  the  photocopy of the entire file including the file noting and the correspondence in  respect of the two complaints mentioned above which, reportedly, had been  marked to the CBI by the CVC for enquiry.

5. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

6. Copies of this order be given free of cost to the parties.

(Satyananda Mishra) Chief Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy.  Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against  application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this  Commission.

(Vijay Bhalla) Deputy Registrar CIC/SM/A/2011/000659