Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Central Information Commission

Sh. Risal Singh, N.Delhi vs Dda, New Delhi on 28 April, 2011

                                   1


              Central Information Commission
Room No.296, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama 
                     Place, New Delhi­110066
     Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254 website­cic.gov.in

    Adjunct to  Appeal : No. CIC/LS/A/2010/000735­DS


 Appellant /Complainant        :        Sh. Risal Singh, New 
Delhi     
Public Authority               :     DDA, New Delhi
                               (Sh. Ram Kishan, 
Dy.Dir./CPIO, Ms. 
                               Varsha Sinha, Director/AA, 
Sh.Madan Lal
                               And Sh.Anil Kumar)

Date of Hearing                :       28 April 2011 
Date of Decision               :       28 April 2011 
Facts:­ 

1.   In   pursuance   of   Commission's   order   of   even  number   dated   2   February   2011,   the   matter   was   heard  today at which   respondent was present as above along  with   former   CPIO   Shri   Anil   Kumar   who   has   since  retired   .   Shri   Anil   Kumar   stated   that   the   RTI  application   dated   6   July   2009   was   addressed   to   The  Officer   on   Special   Duty   (RL)   and   was   never   received  by   him.   Respondent   had   also   brought   along   with   them  the complete file holding the RTI applications of the  appellant   to   show   that   the   order   of   the   first  appellate   authority,   even   though   it   was   marked   to  Shri   Anil   Kumar   had   in   fact   never   been   received   in  his office. Respondent was at pains to show that all  other   RTI   application   to   the   appellant   had   been  attended  to well  within  the  time  by the former   CPIO  and   that   there   was   no   malafide   in   the   present   case  where   information   had   not   been   provided   in   response  to the RTI  application of the appellant dated 6 July  2009.

2. Respondent informed the Commission that full and  complete   information   had   been   furnished   to   the  appellant   vide   their   letter   dated   11   March   2011,   a  Adjunct to  Appeal : No. CIC/LS/A/2010/000735­DS 2 copy of which was submitted to the Commission and has  been placed on record.

Decision notice

3. After   hearing   the   averments   of   the   respondent  and   the   former   CPIO   Shri   Anil   Kumar,     Commission  accepts   the   explanation   as   credible   and   drops   the  proposed   penalty   proceedings.   However   respondent   is  directed   to   put   their   house   in   order   in   terms   of  having   appropriate   infrastructure   for   handling   RTI  applications   and   put   in   place   a   sound   system   for  receiving   and   disposing   of   applications   received  under this Act. 

(Smt. Deepak Sandhu)     (Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) Under Secretary & Dy. Registrar   Copy to:­
1. Shri Risal Singh  H. No. 308, Police Colony Phase­I, H­Block, Ashok Vihar New Delhi­110052
2. The Central Public Information Officer   (Shri Ram Kishan) DDA, RL, Room No. 114, A­Block,  Vikas Sadan, INA, New Delhi­110023
3. The Appellate Authority DDA, RL, Room No. 114, A­Block,  Vikas Sadan, INA, New Delhi­110023
4. Shri Anil Kumar Former CPIO DDA, RL, Room No. 114, A­Block,  Vikas Sadan, INA, New Delhi­110023
5. The Vice Chairman Adjunct to  Appeal : No. CIC/LS/A/2010/000735­DS 3 DDA,  A­Block,  Vikas Sadan, INA, New Delhi­110023           Adjunct to  Appeal : No. CIC/LS/A/2010/000735­DS