Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Delhi District Court

Smt. Shabda Magon vs State (Govt. Of Nct) Of Delhi on 29 November, 2018

        IN THE COURT OF SH. ARUN KUMAR GARG:
   ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL JUDGE - cum- COMMERCIAL CIVIL
    JUDGE - cum- ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROLLER: SOUTH
      WEST DISTRICT : DWARKA COURTS : NEW DELHI.

S.C.­42/18

Smt. Shabda Magon
W/o Sh. Mahinder Magon,
R/o C­3/248, Janak Puri, 
Near Lawrence Public School, 
New Delhi­110058.
                                                 .............Petitioner
                    vs.

1. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi.

2.Indusind Bank Ltd.
731, Solitaire Corporate Park,
167, Guru Hargovindji Marg,
Mumbai, Maharashtra­400093.

Also at:
 Indusind Bank Ltd.
3rd Floor, Vasant Square Mall,
Vasant Kunj, New Delhi­110070.

3. Link Intime India Pvt. Ltd.
Ragistrar & Shares Tranfer Agent
C­101, 247 Park, Lal Bhadur Shastri Marg,
Vikhroli West, Mumbai­400083.

4. Swati Sharma
W/o Sh. Raghav Sharma
R/o C­3/258 Janak Puri,
Near Lawrence Public School, New Delhi­110058.

5. Ritu Bhardwaj
W/o Vishal Bhardwaj
R/o C­3/258 Janak Puri,
Near Lawrence Public School,
SC­42/18
Shabda Magon. vs. The State & ors.
Judgment dated 29.11.2018                            Page No.1 of 7                 
 New Delhi­110058.
                                                               ..........Respondents

Petition   U/s   372   of   Indian   Succession   Act   for   grant   of
Succession   Certificate   in   respect   of   debts   and   securities   of
deceased Sh. Mohinder Kumar.

                                     Date of Institution          :   24.04.18
                                     Date of Reserving Judgment   :   N.A.
                                     Date of Judgment             :   29.11.18

                                     JUDGMENT:

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner for grant of Succession certificate U/s 372 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (herein after referred to as the Act), in respect of debts and securities of deceased Sh. Mohindra Kumar Magon.

2. The State, Indusind Bank Ltd., 731, Solitaire Corporate Park, 167, Guru Hargovindji Marg, Mumbai, Maharashtra­400093. and also   at   Indusind   Bank   Ltd.,   3 rd  Floor,   Vasant   Square   Mall,   Vasant Kunj,New   Delhi­110070,     Link   Intime   India   Pvt.   Ltd.,   Registrar   & Shares Transfer Agent, C­101, 247 Park, Lal Bhadur Shastri Marg, Vikhroli West, Mumbai, Swati Sharma and Ritu Bhardwaj have  been impleaded as respondents.

PLEADINGS:­

3. It has been averred by the petitioner that Sh.  Mohinder Kumar  died   on   16.08.2017   at   Janak   Puri,   New   Delhi.   It   is   further averred that deceased was the ordinary resident of Janak Puri, New Delhi,   which   falls   within   the   jurisdiction   of   this   court.   It   is   further averred that deceased was survived by three legal heirs i.e petitioner (wife of the deceased), respondent nos.4 & 5 (both daughters of the deceased).   In   the   petition,   she   has   prayed   for   grant   of   succession SC­42/18 Shabda Magon. vs. The State & ors.

Judgment dated 29.11.2018   Page No.2 of 7                 

certificate in respect of shares issued in the name of her deceased husband   by   Indusind   Bank   Ltd.,   who   according   to   her   had   died intestate on 16.08.2017.

4. Notice of the petition was issued to the respondents and also   ordered   to   be   published   in   newspaper   for   public   &   large   and accordingly publication was done in newspaper titled as "Veer Arjun"

dated 21.05.2018, but none appeared on behalf of public at large, to raise   any   objection   for   grant   of   succession   certificate   in   favour   of petitioner.

5. Respondent nos. 4 & 5 did not file any objections to the petition   whereas     a   reply   dated   25.05.2018   was   received   from respondent   no.3   stating   that  900   shares   in   the   name   of   deceased husband having shares certificate nos.389959 to 389967 each consisting of 100 shares each have been transferred to IEPF account and the same can be claimed by the petitioner as per the procedure prescribed under Rule 7 of IEPFA( accounting, audit, transfer and refund) Rules, 2016. EVIDENCE:

6. In   petitioner's   evidence,   only   one   witnesses   has   been examined.

6.1. PW­1 is Petitioner Smt. Shabda Magon. She has proved the copy of her Aadhar card and death certificate of her husband as Ex.PW1/A (OSR) and Ex.PW1/B respectively. She has deposed that her mother in law namely Smt. Darshana Rani expired about 03­04 years ago.   She   has   further   deposed   that   her   husband   died   intestate   and besides herself, respondent nos. 4 & 5 are the legal heir/survivor of belongings of her deceased husband and he is not survived by any other legal heir. She has further deposed that respondent no.4 & 5 have given their no objection in her favour in respect of debts and SC­42/18 Shabda Magon. vs. The State & ors.

Judgment dated 29.11.2018   Page No.3 of 7                 

securities as mentioned in present petition.  She has   further testified that   the   present   petition   has   been   filed   for   grant   of   succession certificate in her favour in respect of share issued by  Indusind Bank Ltd. as mentioned in Schedule A of the present petition, in the name of her   husband.   She   has   further   deposed   that   there   are   900   shares   of Indusind   Bank   Ltd.   Regd.   Folio   no.   00164794   in   the   name   of   her deceased   husband   and   the   total   value   of   the   said   shares   is Rs.16,90,200/­   (   900   X   1,878.90   as   on   24.04.2018).   CA   certificate regarding the value of the shares has been filed and the same is Ex. PW1/C (two pages).

She   has   further   relied   upon   the   letter   dated   25.05.2018 received by the court from respondent no.3 stating that 900 shares in the name of her deceased husband having shares certificate nos.389959 to 389967  each  consisting  of 100  shares each have been  transferred  to IEPF account and the same can be claimed by her as per the procedure prescribed   under   Rule   7   of   IEPFA(   accounting,   audit,   transfer   and refund) Rules, 2016. Thereafter, petitioner evidence was closed.

7. Further,   in   respondent   evidence,   two   witnesses   have been examined.

7.1. RW­1 Smt. Ritu Bhardwaj and RW­2 Smt. Swati Sharma, who are respondent nos. 5 & 4, gave their no objections for grant of succession   certificate   in   favour   of   petitioner   regarding   debts   and securities   of   deceased   vide   their   separate   statements.  Thereafter, respondent evidence was closed.

ARGUMENTS, APPREICIATION OF EVIDENC & REASONS:­

8. I have heard the arguments and perused the material on record carefully.

9. In  Madhvi   Amma   Bhawani   Amma   &   Ors.  Vs. SC­42/18 Shabda Magon. vs. The State & ors.

Judgment dated 29.11.2018   Page No.4 of 7                 

Kunjikutty Pillai Meenakshi, AIR 2000 SC 2301, 2000 (3) ALT 35 SC, 2001 (49) BLJR 813, it was held as under:

" The enquiry in proceedings for grant of succession certificate is to be summary, and the Court, without determining questions of law or fact, which seem to it to be too intricate and difficult for determination,   should   grant   the   certificate   to   the   person   who appears to have prima facie the best title thereto.  In such cases the Court has not to determine definitely and finally as to who has the best right to the estate.  All that it is required to do is to hold a summary enquiry into the right to the certificate, with a view, on the one hand, to facilitate the collection of debts due to the   deceased   and   prevent   their   being   time­barred,   owing   (for instance)   to   dispute   between   the   heirs   inter   se   as   to   their preferential right to succession, and, on the other hand, to afford protection to the debtors by appointing a representative of the deceased and authorising him to give a valid discharge for the debt.  The grant of a certificate to a person does not give him an absolute   right   to   the   debt   nor   does   it   bar   a   regular   suit   for adjustment of the claims of the heirs inter se".   

10. From the oral and documentary evidence on record, my prima facie findings are as under:­ 10.1. The deceased, at the time of his death, was the resident of Janak Puri, New Delhi, which is reflected from his death certificate proved as Ex.PW1/B. It falls within the jurisdiction of this court. 10.2. The deceased had expired on 16.08.2017 leaving behind three surviving class­1 legal heirs i.e petitioner (wife of the deceased), respondent nos.4 & 5 (both daughters of the deceased). Respondent nos. 4   & 5   have given their no objection in favour of petitioner for grant of succession certificate in respect of debts and securities as mentioned in the present succession petition. DEBTS & SECURITIES:­ 10.3. The deceased died intestate qua debts and securities as SC­42/18 Shabda Magon. vs. The State & ors.

Judgment dated 29.11.2018   Page No.5 of 7                 

mentioned in the petition which is as follows:­

(i).Total 900 shares of Indusind Bank Ltd. under   shares certificate nos.389959 to 389967 each consisting of 100 shares,  having total value of Rs. 16,90,200/­ as on 24.04.2018 as per certificate Ex.PW1/C. Therefore,   the   total   value   of   the   securities   held   by   the deceased for which succession certificate has been applied for, turns out to be  Rs. 16,90,200/­ .

10.4. The   aforesaid   claim   of   the   petitioner   for   issuance   of succession   certificate   in   respect   of   debts   and   securities   as   per Schedule A has gone unrebutted and nobody has appeared on behalf of the public to contest the claim of the petitioner. There is also no impediment U/s 370 of the Act to grant Succession Certificate with respect to debts and securities as mentioned in Schedule A to the application.

CONCLUSION:­

11. In view of the aforesaid observations, this court holds that   petitioner   Smt.   Shabda   Magon   is   entitled   for   grant   of Succession   Certificate   U/s   373   of   the   Act   in   respect   of  the aforementioned securities of the deceased Sh. Suraj Bhan Saroha having total value of Rs. 16,90,200/­ alongwith dividends, if any, accrued thereupon.

12. Accordingly,   succession   certificate   be   issued   to   the petitioner Smt. Shabda Magon on filing of corresponding court fees in   terms   of   Article   12   Schedule   I   of   Court   Fees   Act,   1870   as applicable   in   Delhi   and   Indemnity­cum­surety   bond   of   the   like amount,   within   30   days   from   today.   Petition   is   accordingly, SC­42/18 Shabda Magon. vs. The State & ors.

Judgment dated 29.11.2018   Page No.6 of 7                 

disposed of.

File be consigned to record room, after due compliance.

Announced in the open court on this 29th day of November, 2018. This order consists of 07 signed pages.

(Arun Kumar Garg) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC(SW) Dwarka Courts, New Delhi SC­42/18 Shabda Magon. vs. The State & ors.

Judgment dated 29.11.2018   Page No.7 of 7                 

S.C.­42/18 Smt. Shabda Magon vs. The State & ors.

29.11.18 Present: Petitioner in person with counsel Sh Nitin Panwar.

None for respondents.

PW­1 examined and discharged.

On a separate statement of petitioner, PE stands closed. Final arguments heard.

By   way   of   detailed   separate   Judgment   of   even   date announced in the open court,   the present petition is disposed off with a direction to issue succession certificate in favour of petitioner Smt. Shabda Magon in respect of 900 shares of Indusind Bank Ltd. In the name of her deceased husband Sh.   Mohindra Kumar Magon, under  shares certificate nos.389959 to 389967 each consisting of 100 shares,  having total value of Rs. 16,90,200/­ as on 24.04.2018, on filing of corresponding court fees in terms of Article 12 Schedule I of Court Fees Act, 1870 as applicable in Delhi  and Indemnity­cum­ surety bond of the like amount, within 30 days from today. Petition is accordingly, disposed of.

File   be   consigned   to   record   room,   after   due compliance.

   (Arun Kumar)        ACJ­CCJ­ARC (SW)     Dwarka Courts:29.11.18 SC­42/18 Shabda Magon. vs. The State & ors.

Judgment dated 29.11.2018   Page No.8 of 7                 

SC­42/18 Shabda Magon. vs. The State & ors.

Judgment dated 29.11.2018   Page No.9 of 7