Kerala High Court
P.Basheer vs District Police Chief on 19 May, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID
TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014/13TH KARTHIKA, 1936
WP(C).No. 26139 of 2014 (N)
----------------------------
PETITIONER:
-------------------
P.BASHEER, S/O LATE UKKAS
BASID MANSIL, MASJID ROAD
KANHANGAD KADAPPURAM
KANHANGAD.P.O, KASARAGOD-670315.
BY ADV. SRI.REKESH.V.R.
RESPONDENTS:
-----------------------
1. DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
VIDYA NAGAR, KASARAGOD-671123.
2. C.I.OF POLICE, KANHANGAD POLICE
STATION, KASARAGOD-671315.
R1 & R2 BY Sr. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. SAREENA GEORGE P.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-11-2014,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 26139 of 2014 (N)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
------------------------------------
EXT.P1 COPY OF THE SALE AGREEMENT ENTERED BETWEEN BASHEER AND
BALAKRISHNAN DATED 19-05-2012
EXT.P2 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT PREFERRED BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT ON
30-08-2014
EXT.P3 COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 04-10-2014
EXT.P4 COPY OF THE SALE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BETWEEN P.V.SHJANKARAN
AND GIRIJA DATED 25-08-2011
EXT.P5 COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY GIRIJA TO RAIHANATH SHOWING THE
CANCELLATION OF SALE AGREEMENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS
--------------------------------------
NIL
// TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE
SD
P. UBAID, J.
---------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 26139 Of 2014
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 4th day of November, 2014
JUDGMENT
The petitioner herein seeks a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent herein to take appropriate steps on Ext.P2 complaint made by him. What he wants practically is registration of a crime, and investigation thereon. Ext.P2 complaint in fact does not disclose any cognizable offence. What he wants at the most is interference of the police for settlement of the dispute wherein he is involved. He does not in fact seek criminal prosecution, and the complaint also does not contain definite allegations constituting any definite offence. I find that this is a mischievous writ petition, and it is liable to be dismissed.
In the result, this writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
P. UBAID, JUDGE
sd
// TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE