Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Sona Samrat Maurya vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 3 April, 2026





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


Neutral Citation No. - 2026:AHC:72719-DB
 

 
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD 
 
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4778 of 2026   
 
   Sona Samrat Maurya    
 
  .....Petitioner(s)   
 
 Versus  
 
   State Of U.P. And 2 Others    
 
  .....Respondent(s)       
 
   
 
  
 
Counsel for Petitioner(s)   
 
:   
 
Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari   
 
  
 
Counsel for Respondent(s)   
 
:   
 
G.A.   
 
     
 
 Court No. - 47
 
   
 
 HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J.  

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

Heard Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Murtaza Ali, learned State Law Officer on behalf of State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that there was a marriage in the petitioner?s home and though, he was a candidate in the CTET examination scheduled to he held on 08.02.2026 from 9.30 a.m. to 12 noon, he did not participate.

On the other hand, the FIR shows that an imposter appeared for the petitioner in the examination and wrote it for him. He was caught and the biometric data revealed his false identity. It is very difficult for us to accept the petitioner disputed defence. Even an imposter would not go and write an examination for no consideration.

In the totality of circumstances, we are not inclined to quash the impugned FIR which affects the integrity of the Public Examination System. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Tarun Saxena,J.) (J.J. Munir,J.) April 3, 2026 C. MANI/ Prashant