Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Of Sh. Parmanand vs Prem Lal And Others" on 6 January, 2022

Author: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

                           1


IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
            ON THE   6th DAY OF JANUARY, 2022
                        BEFORE




                                                       .
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN





 CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION MAIN (ORIGINAL) NO.
                        358 OF 2021





 Between:

     TILAK RAJ SON OF SH. JOGU SON




     OF SH. PARMANAND, RESIDENTOF
     VILLAGE & POST OFFICE TAKKA,
     TEHSIL AND DISTRICT UNA (H.P.)
     AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS


                       ...PETITIONER

 (BY MR. DHEERAJ K. VASHISHTA,


 ADVOCATE)




    AND





            1.   STATE     OF    H.P.
            THROUGH       DIVISIONAL
            COMMISSIONER     KANGRA





            AT DHARAMSHALA, H.P.
            2. HARISH CHANDER, SON
            OF SH. DEV RAJ,
            3. SMT. KAMLA DEVI,
            DAUGHTER OF DEV RAJ,
            4. SMT. SANTOSH KUMARI,
            DAUGHTER OF DEV RAJ,




                                      ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:33:56 :::CIS
                    2


     5. AVINASH CHAND, SON
     OF SH. ROSHAN LAL.
     6. SHIV SHAMBHU, SON OF
     SH. ROSHAN LAL
     ALL ARE RESIDENT OF




                                            .
     MAHAL TIKKA, TEHSIL AND





     DISTRICT UNA, H.P.
     7. RAJ KUMAR SON OF SH.





     JOGU
     8. RAMESH CHAND, SON OF
     SH. JOGU
     9. PARKASH CHAND, SON




     OF SH. DEV RAJ,
     10. SUDHA, DAUGHTER OF
     SH. SURINDER
     11. NEETA, DAUGHTER OF

     SH. SURINDER

     12. PANKAJ KUMAR, SON
     OF SH. SURINDER
     13. VIJAY KUMAR, SON OF


     SH. SURINDER
     14. MANOJ KUMAR, SON OF
     SH. MADAN MOHAN




     15. RAJESH KUMAR SON
     OF SH. MADAN MOHAN





     16. SMT. NIDHI, DAUGHTER
     OF SH. ASHOK KUMAR,
     17. DHEERAJ KUMAR, SON





     OF SH. ASHOK KUMAR,
     18. SUMAN DEVI, WIFE OF
     SH. ASHOK KUMAR
     19. PARWEEN KUMAR SON
     OF SH. RAM ASRA,
     20. TARSEM LAL, SON OF
     SH. JOGU,




                           ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:33:56 :::CIS
                     3


      21.   KAUSHALYA     DEVI,
      WIFE    OF  SH.    KEWAL
      KRISHAN, SON OF JOGU
      22. AJAY KUMAR, SON OF
      SH. SUBHASH CHAND,




                                              .
      23. DAVINDER KUMAR, SON





      OF SH. SUBHASH CHAND
      24.     KUMARI      ALKA,





      DAUGHTER     OF    SANEH
      LATA WIDOW OF SUBASH
      CHAND SON OF SH. JOGU
      25. OM DUTT, SON OF SH.




      RAM NATH, SON OF SH.
      MILKHI RAM
      26. HARI DUTT, SON OF SH.
      RAM      NATH,     SONOF

      SH.MILKHI RAM,

      27 SANJAY KUMAR, SON OF
      SH. RAVINDER, SON OF SH.
      RAM NATH,


      28. SURESH KUMAR, SON
      OF SH. RAVINDER, SON OF
      SH. RAM NATH




      29. RAM PIARI, WIFE OF
      RAM LAL, SONOF NONIDH





      ALL ARE RESIDENT OF
      VILLAGE TAKKA, TEHSIL
      AND DISTRICT UNA,H.P.





                ...RESPONDENTS

    (MR. RAJINDER DOGRA, ADDL. ADVOCATE
    GENERAL WITH MR. VINDO THAKUR,
    ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL AND




                             ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:33:56 :::CIS
                                   4


          MR.RAJAT CHAUHAN, LAW OFFICER, FOR
          RESPONDENT NO. 1)

                This petition coming on for admissions this day, this




                                                                .
    Court passed the following:





                ORDER

Notice. Mr. Rajinder Dogra, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No. 1.

2. An innocuous prayer is made in this petition seeking direction to the Divisional Commissioner, Kangra, to dispose of the revision petitions No. 145/2014 and 147 of 2014, which were filed way back in the year 2014.

3. Petitioner is a senior citizen, currently aged about 70 years. Therefore, I see no reason to issue notices to the private respondents as the prayer made in the petition is totally innocuous, for which no party, much less the opposite parties can have any grievance or objection.

3. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Divisional Commissioner, Kangra at Dharamshala to dispose of the revision petitions No. 145/2014 and 147/2014, titled as "Harish Chander and others versus Prem Lal and others"

and "Harish Chander versus Ram Kumar and others" respectively, ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:33:56 :::CIS 5 as expeditiously as possible and in no event later than 31.3.2022.
The pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of.
.
                                               (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)





                                                       Judge





    January 6, 2022
    Kalpana




                        r           to









                                                 ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:33:56 :::CIS