Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Manjabai Eknath Shewale L.Rs. Ganesh ... vs Sagunabai Panditrao Anchalwadkar Thr ... on 8 January, 2024

This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //                   spk (2).odt
                                              (1)


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                    CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11467 OF 2023
                                    IN
                       SECOND APPEAL NO.1 OF 2013

        MANJABAI EKNATH SHEWALE LRS GANESH AND OTHERS
                                VERSUS
       SAGUNABAI PANDITRAO ANCHALWADKAR THR LRS ASHA
                   MANOHAR D ANSURE AND OTHERS
                                    ...
                 Advocate for Applicants : Mr. G.S. Shete
      Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3, 4/A, 4/B, 5, 6, 7 & 11 : Mr.
                           Shriram Deshmukh
                                    ...
                                    CORAM : S.G. MEHARE, J.

DATED : JANUARY 08, 2024 PER COURT:-

1. This praecipe pertains to the speaking to the minutes of order dated 12.09.2023.
2. The terms of compromise were placed before the Court between the parties to the present appeal and it was marked as 'A-1'.

The learned Registrar (Judicial) has verified the terms of settlement and submitted its report on 07.09.2023. This Court accepted the settlement terms and passed the order that the appeal is allowed in terms of settlement and impugned judgment and decree is set aside.

3. The learned counsels to the compromise petition would submit that one of the party to the original suit and the impugned judgment and decree of the First Appellate Court has preferred a separate appeal which is registered as Second Appeal No.14 of 2013.

This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // spk (2).odt (2) She is not the party to this compromise. Hence, the observations of setting aside the impugned judgment and decree (in a first appeal) may come into their way. They have requested to modify the order dated 12.09.2023. From the submissions made above, it appears that it was a partial compromise between few parties to the suit.

4. In pursuance of the statement, para 2 of the order is modified as follows :

"The impugned judgment and decree is set aside to the extent of the parties to the settlement terms at annexure 'A-1'.

5. Necessary corrections be carried out and corrected order be uploaded.

6. Praecipe accordingly stands disposed of.

(S.G. MEHARE, J.) Mujaheed// Signed by: Syed Mujaheed Naseer Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 09/01/2024 19:02:24