Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Shree Renuka Sagars Ltd., vs Basalingappa Marihal on 13 September, 2013

Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda

Bench: A.N.Venugopala Gowda

                            :1:


         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                 DHARWAD BENCH

  DATED THIS THE 13 T H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2013

                         BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA

       WRIT PETI TION No.64927/2010 (GM-CPC)

 BETWEEN:

 SHREE RENUKA SAGARS LTD.,
 BC 105, HAVELOCK ROAD, CAMP,
 BELGAUM.
 REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL OFFICER,
 SHRI. SANJEEV P KULKARNI.

                                            ... PETITIONER
 (By Sri. VEERESH R BUDIHAL, ADV.)

 AND

 1.    BASALINGAPPA MARIHAL
       AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
       S/O SRI. RUDRAPPA MARIHAL,
       OCC: AGRI., R/O: INCHAL,
       TQ: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELGAUM.

 2.    KARVY COMPUTER PRIVATE LTD.,
       KARVY HOUSE, NO.47, AVENUE 4,
       BANJARA HILLS, STREET NO.1,
       HYDERABAD-34.

                                          ... RESPONDENTS
 (By Sri. A G MULAWADMATH, ADV. FOR R1,
 R2 SERVED BUT UN-REPRESENTED.)

       THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER A RTICLES
 226 & 227 OF CONS TITU TION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
 ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF PROHIBITION PROHIBITING
 THE HON'BLE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE
 (JR.DN.), BELGAUM AT BELGAUM FROM PROCEEDING WITH
 THE ORIGINAL SUIT BEARING NO.828/2008, AS THE SAID
                          :2:


COURT DOES NOT HAVE THE JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN
THE SAID SUIT AND ETC.

     THIS  WRIT  PETITION    COMING    ON   FOR
PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP TH IS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                        ORDER

Since O.S. No.828/2008 on the file of Civil Judge (Junior Division) Belgaum has been dismissed on 03.12.2010, this writ petition would not survive for consideration, as rightly contended by Shri A.G.Mulawadmath, learned advocate for respondent No.1.

There is no appearance for the petitioner. Petition dismissed as not surviving for consideration, with no order as to costs.

SD/-

JUDGE Rsh