State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Assistent Engineer A.V.V.N.Ltd. vs Ramesh Kumar S/O Devi Sahaya on 24 August, 2018
1 jkT; miHkksDrk fookn izfrrks"k vk;ksx] cSap la- 1] jktLFkku t;iqj vihy la[;k&1061@2017 vtesj fo|qr forj.k fuxe fyfeVsM
------vihykFkhZ cuke .jes'k dqekj
------ izR;FkhZ le{k % ekuuh; Jh dey dqekj ckxMh] lnL; ¼U;kf;d½ ekuuh; lnL; Jherh ehuk esgrk mifLFkr %& vihykFkhZ dh vkSj ls ch0,l0ekVok vf/koDrk vkns'k fnukad 24 vxLr] 2018 jkT; vk;ksx jktLFkku t;iqj ¼}kjk Jh dey dqekj ckxM+h] lnL;]U;kf;d½ ;g vihy vtesj fo|qr forj.k fuxe fyfeVsM dh vksj ls jes'k dqekj ds fo:) ftyk miHkksDrk fookn izfrrks"k eap] >qU>quw ds fu.kZ; fnukad 19-07-2017 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh xbZ gSA izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd ifjoknh us vius firk ds uke ls ,d ?kjsyq fo|qr dusD'ku foi{kh ds ;gkWa ls ys j[kk gS ftldk [kkrk la[;k 2102@0276 gSA ifjoknh ds firk dk nsgkar gks pqdk gSA ifjoknh gh mDr fo|qr dusD'ku dk mi;ksx o miHkksx dj foi{kh dks fcy tek djkrk vk jgk gSA blfy, ifjoknh 2 foi{kh dk miHkksDrk gSA foi{kh }kjk ifjoknh dks fo|qr fcy ekg twu 2015 esa miHkksx 12673 ;wfuV ntZ dj 21804@&:- dk xyr :i ls tkjh dj fHktok;k x;k mDr fo|qr fcy esa ekg vizSy 2015 dh xyr ;wfuV vafdr dj j[kh gS ifjoknh us mDr fo|qr fcy dks nq:Lr djus gsrq foi{kh dk;kZy; esa lEidZ fd;k ijUrq foi{kh ls ckj ckj fuosnu fd;s tkus ds ckotwn ifjoknh dk fcy nq:Lr ugha fd;k rFkk mDr fookfnr fcy dh jkf'k tek ugha djkus ij ifjoknh dk fo|qr laca/k foPNsn fd;s tkus dh /kedh nhA foi{kh dh vksj ls tokc esa dFku fd;k fd ekpZ 2012 esa ehVj esa jhfMax ntZ ugha gksus ds dkj.k ifjoknh dk ehVj fMQsfDVo Js.kh esa ntZ gks x;kA blfy, ifjoknh dks tks Hkh fo|qr fcy fn;s x;s os lHkh U;wure miHkksx ds vk/kkj ij fn;s tkrs jgs tc fd miHkksDrk ds fo|qr ehVj esa miHkksx vf/kd gksrk jgkA izdj.k dh tkudkjh gksus ij miHkksDrk dk fcy okLrfod fo|qr miHkksx ds vuqlkj tkjh dj fn;k x;kA cgl lquh ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA ifjoknh dk fo|qr dusD'ku mlds firk ds uke ls Fkk ftldk ifjoknh fcy Hkj jgk Fkk] firk dh e`R;q gks x;h ifjoknh us fo|qr dusD'ku vius uke ls ugha djok;kA bl laca/k esa 2009 ( 4 )CPR (NC) 334 (NC) Hari Prasad @ Harish Kumar Vs. MU.H.B.V.N.L. through managing Director and ors. esa ekuuh; jk"Vªh; vk;ksx us fuEu fu/kkZfjr fd;k gS%& Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 2 (1)(d), 14 (1) (d), 17 and 21 Electricity invalid Bill District Forum allowed claim and quashed the bill on the ground that dispute was not referred to Electrical inspector However order of District Forum set aside by State Commission Electric connection is not in name of complainant In order to fall within ambit of consumer, beneficiary must avail services with approval of consumer (First mentioned 3 person) Except of bare averments no other material to sustain claim of complainant that he is beneficiary of said connection Instant litigation appearing to be proxy litigation Complainant is not a consumer Revision petition dismissed with costs.
fLFkfr ns[krs gq, ifjoknh miHkksDrk dh Js.kh esa ugha vkrk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ifjoknh fdlh izdkj dk vuqrks"k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gSA fo)ku ftyk eap us tks vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS og lkjghu] Hkkjghu] vk/kkjghu gS vikLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gS] vikLr fd;k tkrk gSA vihy Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA ¼ ehuk esgrk ½ ¼ dey dqekj ckxMh ½ lnL; lnL; ¼U;kf;d½ @ikBd@