Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Remya K P vs State Of Kerala on 22 January, 2026

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

                                               2026:KER:5289




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                        PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 2ND MAGHA, 1947

                 WP(C) NO. 2574 OF 2026

PETITIONER:

         REMYA K P
         AGED 39 YEARS
         /O. SUNESH K P, H.S.T HINDI
         K. R. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL PURAMERI
         RESIDING AT KALARIKOTTIYA PARAMBATH,
         KAKKOTTIL POST, VATAKARA,
         KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673507

         BY ADVS.
         SRI.POOVAMULLE PARAMBIL ABDULKAREEM
         SRI.K.N.KUMARASWAMY SARMA



RESPONDENTS:

    1    STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
         GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE,
         THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695001

    2    DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION
         OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,
         JAGATHY, THIRUVANATHAPURAM, PIN - 695014

    3    REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR
         OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR,
         HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE,
         PIN - 673004
                                              2026:KER:5289
WP(C) No.2574 of 2026
                            2

    4     MANAGER
          K. R. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL PURAMERI,
          PURAMERI POST, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,
          PIN - 673503

    5     SMT. AJITHA KULAMULLATHIL
          H.S.S.T (MATHEMATICS), UNAPPROVED,
          K. R. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL PURAMERI,
          PURAMERI POST, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT,
          PIN - 673503



BY ADV.

          SRI.V. VENUGOPAL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP        FOR
ADMISSION ON 22.01.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME        DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                       2026:KER:5289
WP(C) No.2574 of 2026
                                 3


                           JUDGMENT

Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2026 The petitioner is working as High School Assistant (Hindi) in Kadathanadu Rajas HS School from 08.09.2021 onwards and she is the next person to be promoted / appointed as Higher Secondary School Teacher in the vacancy arose during the Academic Year 2025-2026 in accordance with the Kerala Education Rules, 1959.

2. In the Academic Year 2025-2026, two retirement vacancies of HSST (Hindi) and HSST (Mathematics) arose in the School. The first vacancy arose on 31.03.2025 due to the retirement of the Principal of the School as HSST (Hindi) and the second vacancy arose on 31.05.2025 as HSST (Mathematics).

3. The petitioner stakes a claim for HSST (Hindi) as she is fully qualified for the post. But, the Manager 2026:KER:5289 WP(C) No.2574 of 2026 4 appointed the 5th respondent, who is unqualified, to the post of HSST (Mathematics). However, the said appointment was not approved till date on the ground that she is not having prescribed qualification.

4. According to the petitioner, if any appointment is made in the absence of the prescribed qualification, such appointment cannot be considered as a valid appointment. Though the petitioner made several requests to the 4th respondent to appoint the petitioner in the post of HSST (Hindi) to follow the ratio 1:3, the said request was not heeded. Therefore, the petitioner approached the 3 rd respondent filing Ext.P6 representation, which is pending.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader representing respondents 1 to 3. Notice to respondents 4 and 5 is dispensed with in view of the nature of the relief to be granted in the writ petition.

2026:KER:5289 WP(C) No.2574 of 2026 5

6. The contention of the petitioner is that the 5 th respondent is unqualified for appointment to the post of HSST (Mathematics) and nevertheless, the 5 th respondent has been granted appointment.

7. It is submitted that the question of approval to be granted to the 5 th respondent is pending. In the meanwhile, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P6 representation before the 3rd respondent.

8. In the facts of the case, it would be only just and proper that the 3rd respondent considers Ext.P6 while considering the question of approval to the appointment of the 5th respondent.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P6 representation submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of two months and at any rate before finalising the issue of approval of appointment granted to the 2026:KER:5289 WP(C) No.2574 of 2026 6 5th respondent, if the appointment is not already approved. The petitioner and respondents 4 and 5 shall be granted opportunity of hearing while taking a decision.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk 2026:KER:5289 WP(C) No.2574 of 2026 7 APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 2574 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 08/09/2021 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.

B6/56671/2023 DATED 28/01/2024 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VATAKARA Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.

                   DEOVKA/2237/2024-B6    (3)/DEO     DATED
                   31/08/2024    ISSUED     BY     DISTRICT
                   EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
Exhibit P4         TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED

28/01/2025 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19/05/2025 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P6 TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15/01/2026 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT