Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 11, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Hasan vs State on 24 June, 2011

Author: K.M.Thaker

Bench: K.M.Thaker

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/8479/2011	 3/ 3	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 8479 of 2011
 

=========================================================

 

HASAN
ALIAS FAROOKBHAI VALIBHAI - THRO' DILSAD HASAN PATEL - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MS
SUBHADRA G PATEL for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR. DABHI, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 24/06/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER 

1. Rule.

Mr. Dabhi, learned APP waives service of Notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. The applicant has taken out present application seeking temporary bail in connection with the offence registered as CR.No.I-74 of 2010 with Varnama Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 324, 323, 337, 504 of Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of Bombay Police Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Ms. Patel, learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that the mother of the applicant is suffering from paralysis and applicant is the only son. Nobody is there to look after his mother and just to make arrangement for proper treatment of his mother, she requested that the applicant may be released on temporary bail.

4. On the other hand Mr. Dabhi, learned APP opposed the submission of the learned advocate for the applicant and submitted that looking to the nature and seriousness of the offence, the application does not deserve to be entertained.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing for the contesting parties. Considering the above aspects, the applicant is ordered to be released on temporary bail for a period of one week on usual conditions on his depositing an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) with the Jail authorities. On completion of the aforesaid period he shall surrender himself to the concerned Jail Authorities.

6. The application stands disposed of. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted today.

(K.M.THAKER,J.) Vahid     Top