Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Sukhpal vs State Of Haryana And Others on 6 February, 2023

Author: Vikas Bahl

Bench: Vikas Bahl

                                                               Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:022038




  (144)         IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                              AT CHANDIGARH

                                                       CWP-2397-2023
                                                       Date of Decision:06.02.2023

          Sukhpal
                                                                      ... Petitioner

                                   Vs.


          State of Haryana and others                                 ... Respondents


          CORAM :           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL

          Present :         Mr. Brijender Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

                            Ms. Upasana Dhawan, A.A.G. Haryana
                            for the respondents.


          VIKAS BAHL, J. (Oral)

This writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ or direction, especially in the nature of certiorari for setting aside order dated NIL (Annexure P-

4) whereby respondent No.2 has issued directions to hand over vacant possession of the land to the private respondents inspite of directions by respondent No.1 to maintain status quo vide order dated 21.04.2022.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the present case ROR-73-2022 was filed by the petitioner before the Financial Commissioner, Haryana and vide order dated 21.04.2022, after hearing the arguments of the private respondents, who had filed caveat, the matter was admitted and status quo was maintained till the next date of hearing i.e. 27.4.2022. It is submitted that thereafter, the Financial Commissioner did not hold Court and that the said For Subsequent orders see CM-3602-CWP-2023 Decided by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 28-05-2023 22:50:46 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:022038 CWP-2397-2023 -2- status quo could not be ordered to be continue. It is further submitted that in the meantime, the Collector initiated proceedings to evict the present petitioner and that the Collector has now fixed the case for 09.02.2023 for awaiting the compliance report regarding warrants of possession.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the ROR is also now fixed for 09.02.2023 before Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Haryana. It is submitted that in the present case the service of all the persons has not been effected and thus, on 09.02.2023, the matter cannot be finally adjudicated.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied in case respondent No.1- Financial Commissioner is directed to consider the application filed by the petitioner under Section 151 CPC for stay (Annexure P-5) on 09.02.2023 or immediately thereafter and has prayed that till the time the said application is not considered and decided, the interim order of status quo passed on 21.04.2022, be continued.

Learned State counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 has submitted that every endeavor shall be made by the Financial Commissioner to decide the application Annexure P-5 for stay on 09.02.2023 or within a period of one week immediately thereafter.

Keeping in view the above-said facts and circumstances, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Haryana, before whom ROR No.73 of For Subsequent orders see CM-3602-CWP-2023 Decided by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 28-05-2023 22:50:46 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:022038 CWP-2397-2023 -3- 2022 is pending, to consider and decide the application Annexure P-5 on 09.02.2023 or within a period of one week thereafter and till such time, the application is not decided, interim order of status quo as ordered on 21.04.2022 shall continue. However, it is made clear that grant of interim order would not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case and Financial Commissioner (Revenue) would consider the application (Annexure P-5) independently, in accordance with law and would also finally decide ROR-73-2022 in accordance with law.

It would be open to the respondents to move an application for recalling of this order, in case, any of the facts as have been brought before this Court are incorrect.





         06.02.2023                                                    (VIKAS BAHL)
         rajeev                                                           JUDGE

         Whether speaking/reasoned                    Yes/No

         Whether reportable                           Yes/No




                                                          Neutral

For Subsequent orders see CM-3602-CWP-2023 Decided by HON'BLE MR.Citation No:=2023:PHHC:022038 JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL 3 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 28-05-2023 22:50:46 :::