Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Vinayagam vs The Deputy Superintendent Of Police on 9 August, 2023

Author: R.Hemalatha

Bench: R.Hemalatha

                                                                                  Crl.A.No.778 of 2023

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 09.08.2023

                                                     CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA

                                               Crl.A.No.778 of 2023


                   Vinayagam                                                    ...Appellant
                                                        Vs.


                   1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
                      Villupuram Range
                      VOC Street, Thiru vi ka Road
                      Villupuram HO, Villupuram 605 602

                   2. The State rep by its
                      Inspector of Police
                      Periyathachur Police Station
                      Villupuram 604 306

                   3. Divyabarathi                                       .. Respondents



                   Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 14A (2) of the Scheduled Castes
                   and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as amended by
                   Act 1/2016         to set aside the order dated 07.07.2023 passed in
                   Crl.M.P.No.1862 of 2023 on the file of the Special Court for exclusive trial of
                   cases registered under the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
                   (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, (SC/ST (POA) Act) Villiupuram, and to
                   enlarge the appellant on bail in connection with Crime No.109 of 2023.


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


                   1/7
                                                                                    Crl.A.No.778 of 2023

                                           For Appellant    : Mr.L. Infant Dinesh


                                           For R1 & R2      : Mr.S. Sugendran
                                                              Additional Public Prosecutor
                                           For R3           : Mr. K. Sathyaraj



                                                       JUDGMENT

The present Criminal Appeal is filed against the orders dated 07.07.2023, passed in Crl.M.P.No.1862 of 2023 , on the file of the Special Court for SC/ST Cases, Villupuram, and to enlarge the appellant, who is the 1st accused in Crime No.109/2023 of Periyathachur Police Station, Villupuram 604 306.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant belongs to Scheduled Caste Community and the appellant/accused belongs to Yadava community. The appellant/accused and the defacto complainant got married on 29.10.2020 against the wishes of their parents. Subsequently, they got separated and the defacto complainant lodged a complaint with the Inspector of Police, Periyathachur Police Station, Villupuram, against the appellant, her in-laws (parents of the appellant) and her brother-in-law by stating that her in-laws assaulted her and also abused her in filthy language mentioning her community. The further allegation of the defacto complainant is that she https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/7 Crl.A.No.778 of 2023 was threatened with dire consequences.

2.1. Based on the complaint, the Inspector of Police, Periyathachur Police Station, Villupuram, registered an FIR in Crime No.109 of 2023 against the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 323, 506(i) IPC, 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002 r/w 3(1)(f), 3(1)(s), 3(2) (va) and 3(1) (w) (ii) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Thereafter the appellant/accused was arrested and remanded to judicial custody.

2.3. The appellant filed a petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in Crl.M.P. No.1862 of 2023 before the Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of cases registered under SC/ST(POA) Act, Villupuram. The learned trial court judge, vide her orders dated 07.07.2023, dismissed the said petition on the ground that the investigation is still pending and that if the accused is released on bail he would tamper with the witnesses.

2.4. Aggrieved over the same, the present Criminal Appeal is filed by the accused.

3. Heard Mr.L. Infant Dinesh, learned counsel for the appellant, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/7 Crl.A.No.778 of 2023 Mr.S.Sugendran, learned Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. K. Sathyaraj, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent/defacto complainant.

4. Mr.L. Infant Dinesh, learned counsel for the appellant contended that the appellant has not committed any offence under the SC/ST Act and that the investigation has also been completed and hence prayed for grant of bail to the appellant.

5. Mr. K. Sathyaraj, learned counsel for the defacto complainant did not raise any serious objections but he pressed for the return of the articles belonging to the defacto complainant by the appellant. The learned counsel for the appellant contended that the appellant is ready to return back all the jewels and other articles to the defacto complainant. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor contended that the investigation has been completed and that the charge sheet has been filed in e-filing No.2154/2023.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant/accused is enlarged on bail, on the following conditions:

i. The appellant shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- each, with two sureties, of whom, one should be a blood relative, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, Special Court for https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/7 Crl.A.No.778 of 2023 Exclusive Trial of cases registered under SC/ST(POA) Act, Villupuram;
ii. the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression on the surety bond and the trial Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;
iii. the appellant shall report before the respondent/police as and when required;
iv. on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Sessions Judge is entitled to take appropriate action against the appellant in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the appellant released on bail by the learned Sessions Judge himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; and v. if the appellant thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
09.08.2023 bga To https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/7 Crl.A.No.778 of 2023
1. The Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of cases registered under SC/ST(POA) Act, Villupuram
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Villupuram Range VOC Street, Thiru vi ka Road Villupuram HO, Villupuram 605 602
3. The State rep by its Inspector of Police Periyathachur Police Station Villupuram 604 306
4. The Superintendent of Prison Cuddalore Prison, Cuddalore.
5. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai – 600 104.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 6/7 Crl.A.No.778 of 2023 R.HEMALATHA, J.

bga Crl.A.No.778 of 2023 09.08.2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 7/7