Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Malappuram District Bus Operators' ... vs Manjeri Municipality Traffic ... on 4 June, 2012

Author: V.Chitambaresh

Bench: V.Chitambaresh

       

  

  

 
 
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                      PRESENT:

                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

           MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/29TH MAGHA 1934

                             WP(C).No. 4633 of 2013 (D)
                               --------------------------


PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------

       1. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BUS OPERATORS' ASSOCIATION
          (AFFILATED TO ALL KERALA BUS OPERATORS ORGANIZATION)
          MALAPPURAM 676 505
          REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY K.V ABDUL RAHIMAN

       2. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PRIVATE BUS OPERATORS ASSOCIATION
          (REG.NO TCR 609/1993) REPRESENTED BY ITS TREASURER
           K.KUNHI MUHAMMED, CALICUT ROAD, MANJERI 676 121

         BY ADVS.SMT.SUMATHY DANDAPANI (SR.)
                      SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI

RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

       1. MANJERI MUNICIPALITY TRAFFIC REGULATORY COMMITTEE
          REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
          PELLAYIL HOUSE, CALICUT ROAD, MANJERI 676 121

       2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
          MALAPPURAM 676 505
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

       3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
          MANJERI 676 121
          MALAPPURAM DI8STRICT

         R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.M.SANEER.

         THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
     18-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                   APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) NO.4633 OF 2013


PETITIONER'S EXTS



EXT.P1      PHOTOCOPY OF COUNTER AFFAIDAVIT DATED 4-06-2012 IN WPC NO
            5330 OF 2012 FILED BY THE 3RD REPONDENT.

EXT.P2      PHOTOCOPY OF GOVERNMENT ORDER GO(RT) NO 3443/2004/LSGD
            DATED 28-09-2004

EXT.P3      PHOTOCOPY OF JUDGMENT OF THIS HONPOURABLE COURT DATED
             2-1-2013 RENDERED IN WA NO 2262 OF 2012

EXT.P4      PHOTOCOPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 7-2-2013 SUBMITTED BY
            THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE CHIARMAN REGIONAL TRANSPORT
            AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM

EXT.P5      ROUGH SKETCH REFERRED TO IN THE WRIT PETITION.

EXT.P6      PHOTOCOP[Y OF DECISION TAKEN BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN THE
            MEETING HELD ON 11-2-2013

EXT.P7      PHOTOCOPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 12-2-2013 SUBMITTED BY
            THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR MALAPPURAM

EXT.P8      PHOTOCOPY OF DECISION DATEDE 6-11-2012 OF THE SECRETARY
            MANJERI MUNICIPALITY RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONERS UNDER
            RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT VIDE NO E3-17569/2012 DATED 27-11-
            2012

EXT.P9      PHOTOCOPY OF DECISION OF THE CHAIRMAN MANAJERI
            MUNICIPALITY DATED 16-11-2012 RECEIVED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER
            UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT VIDE NO E3-17569/2012 DATED
            26-11-2012




                                    //TRUE COPY//




                                                P.S. TO JUDGE.



                     V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
                      -------------------------------
                   W.P.(C) No. 4633 of 2013
                      -------------------------------
          Dated this the 18th day of February, 2013


                        J U D G M E N T

Ext.P6 decision of the Traffic Regulatory Committee in so far as it introduced several traffic regulations within Manjeri Municipality is impugned in this writ petition. The petitioners contend that the traffic regulations cause severe hardship to the bus operators and is also inconsistent with the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act. The petitioners assert that the implementation of the decision of the Traffic Regulatory Committee would result in the violation of route permits granted by the Regional Transport Authority.

2. I do not want to delve deep into these aspects at this stage since Ext.P7 representation put in by the petitioners is pending consideration. I direct the second respondent (before whom Ext.P7 representation is pending) to take a final decision in the matter after consulting the first respondent Traffic Regulatory Committee. A decision on Ext.P7 representation shall be taken either on 26.2.2013 or on any subsequent date within a period of two weeks after notice to the petitioners. W.P.(C) No.4633 of 2013 2

3. The second respondent is at liberty to convene a special meeting for the purpose of considering Ext.P7 representation as above and bring changes in the traffic regulations, if necessary.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj.