Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 5]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Commissioner Of Central Excise & vs Chemplast Sanmar Ltd on 7 July, 2010

        

 
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH AT CHENNAI


Appeal No.E/89/2010


[Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No.143/2009(P) dt. 19.11.2009 by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Chennai]


For approval and signature:

Honble Ms.JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, Vice-President 


1.	Whether Press Reporters may be allowed to see the Order for publication as per Rule 27 of the CESTAT	 (Procedure) Rules, 1982?					      :

2.	Whether it should be released under Rule 27 of the 
	CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication in any authoritative report or not?				      	      :

3.	Whether the Member wishes to see the fair copy of
	the Order?								      :

4.	Whether Order is to be circulated to the Departmental
	Authorities?							      :

	
Commissioner of  Central Excise &
        Service Tax, LTU, Chennai
Appellant

         
       Versus
     

Chemplast Sanmar Ltd.
Respondent

Appearance:

Shri C.Dhanasekaran, SDR Smt.Radhika Chandrashekar, Adv. For the Appellant For the Respondent CORAM:
Honble Ms.Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice-President Date of hearing : 7.7.2010 Date of decision : 7.7.2010 Final Order No.____________ On hearing both sides and noting that the amount of credit extended to the assessees, which is challenged by the department, is only Rs.4,710/-, I dismiss the appeal without going into the merits of the case.
(Dictated and pronounced in open court) (JYOTI BALASUNDARAM) VICE-PRESIDENT gs 3