Supreme Court - Daily Orders
A.G. Perarivalan vs State Through Superintendent Of Police ... on 14 March, 2018
Bench: Ranjan Gogoi, R. Banumathi, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
1
ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.3 SECTION II-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO(S). 10039-
10040/2016
(ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 06-03-2015
IN CRLOP NO. 4084/2015 AND CRLOP NO. 5073/2015 PASSED BY THE HIGH
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS)
A.G. PERARIVALAN PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
STATE THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)
(IA NO.73470/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR
INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 2530/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR
AND ARGUE IN PERSON ON IA 2532/2017 AND IA NO.118421/2017-
SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE AND IA NO.11073/2018-RECALLING THE COURTS
ORDER) MR. RAMESH DALAL, APPLICANT-IN-PERSON[TOP OF THE LIST])
Date : 14-03-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Gopal Shankarnarayanan, Adv.
Mr. S. Prabu Ramasubramanian, Adv.
Ms. Paari Vendhan, Adv.
Mr. Sabarish Subramaniam, Adv.
Mr. William Vinoth Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Vishwalinban, Adv.
Mr. S. Gowthaman, AOR
For Respondent(s) Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG
Mr. Sanjai Kumar Pathak, Adv.
Mrs. Rekha Pandey, Adv.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Adv.
Ms. Snidha Mehra, Adv.
Ms. Kritika Sachdeva, Adv.
Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, AOR
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
Applicant (s)
VINOD LAKHINA
Date: 2018.03.15
Mr. Ramesh Dalal – in- person
17:15:25 IST
Reason:
2
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Mr. Ramesh Dalal, applicantinperson prays for liberty to withdraw the applications/Crl.M.Ps. for intervention. Liberty, as prayed, is granted. The applications/Crl.M.Ps. for intervention are accordingly closed on withdrawal. CRL.M.P./I.A. NO.11073 OF 2018 IN SLP(CRL) NOS.
1003910040 OF 2016 [FOR RECALL] We have heard Shri Gopal Sankaranarayana, learned counsel for the applicant – accused and Mrs. Pinky Anand, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India.
We have read and considered the confessional statement of the applicant – A.G. Perarivalan @ Arivu (Accused No.18) and the judgment of this Court dated 11th May, 1999 passed in State through Superintendent of Police, CBI/SIT vs. Nalini and others [Death Referene Case No.1 of 1998 (@ D.No. 1151 of 1998) reported in (1999) 5 SCC 253, particularly, those contained in paragraph Nos. 256 to 275, 615, 616 and 707 to 709.
3
We have also considered the affidavit dated 26th October, 2017 filed by V. Thiagarajan (PW
52), retired as D.G.P. (Training), Odisa explaining/stating that the exculpatory part of the confession of the accused applicant (Accused No.18), namely, that he was unaware of the purpose for which the 9 volt batteries were purchased by him and handed over to Sivarasan was not recorded as a part of the confessional statement.
Having regard to the discussions in the judgment of this Court in Nalini and others (supra), specifically the paragraphs referred to above, even if we are to hypothetically proceed that the matter can be relooked by way of the present recall application, we are satisfied that the judgment/order of this Court in Nalini and others (supra) would not require to be reconsidered or reviewed on the grounds urged. We, therefore, dismiss the application seeking recall of this Court judgment/order dated 11th May, 1999 passed in State through Superintendent of Police, CBI/SIT vs. Nalini and others (supra). 4 SLP(CRL) NOS. 1003910040 OF 2016 We have perused the last report with regard to the ongoing investigation by the Multi Disciplinary Monitoring Agency (MDMA) constituted pursuant to the report of Jain Commission. The said report would go to indicate that the investigation is still open and Letter Rogatories have been issued to different countries including Sri Lanka where some of the persons required to be investigated are presently residing.
The Union of India is directed to place before the Court the steps that have been taken and those that can be initiated, through the diplomatic channels, to ensure that investigation with regard to the issue of larger conspiracy is brought to an end as expeditiously as possible.
The CBI will submit a report in this regard to this Court within next four weeks.
List the matters on 18th April, 2018.
[VINOD LAKHINA] [ASHA SONI] AR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER