Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 5]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Pratima Devi vs Anand Prakash on 10 February, 2014

,0
                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA


                    CIVIL/CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION


               TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1421 OF 2012




     PRATIMA DEVI                                            PETITIONER(s)


                                     VERSUS


     ANAND PRAKASH                                           RESPONDENT(s)


                                    WITH


               TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1432 OF 2012




     PRATIMA DEVI                                            PETITIONER(s)


                                     VERSUS


     ANAND PRAKASH        & ANOTHER                          RESPONDENT(s)


                                    WITH


                TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) NO. 473 OF 2012




     PRATIMA DEVI         & ANOTHER                          PETITIONER(s)


                                     VERSUS


     STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS                          RESPONDENT(s)




                                O    R   D   E   R




     T.P. (C) Nos. 1421 of 2012 and 1432 of 2012:
               These are wife’s petitions for transfer of matrimonial case
     being Marriage Petition No. 120 of 2006, titled as "Anand Prakash vs.
     Pratima Devi", from the court of Additional District Judge-I,
     Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh and case under Guardian & Wards Act,     1890
     being Case No. 04/70 of 2012, titled as "Anand Prakash vs. Pratima
     Devi and another" from the court of Additional District Judge-2,
       Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh to the court of District Judge, Karkardooma
       Courts, Delhi.
       2.        We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
       the averments made in the Transfer Petitions and so also counter-
       affidavit and rejoinder-affidavit.
       3.        Having regard to the fact that the petitioner-
       wife is presently residing in New Delhi, we     are   satisfied that
       greater hardship shall be caused to her in case the proceedings in
       the above two cases are allowed to be continued at Fatehpur (Uttar
       Pradesh).
       5.        We, accordingly, allow the transfer petitions and transfer
       matrimonial case being Marriage Petition No. 120 of 2006, titled as
       "Anand Prakash vs. Pratima Devi", from the court of Additional
       District Judge-I, Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh and case under Guardian &
       Wards Act, 1890 being Case No. 04/70 of 2012, titled as "Anand
       Prakash vs. Pratima Devi and another" from the court of Additional
       District Judge-2, Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh to the court of Principal
       District Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. It will be open to the
       Principal District Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi to transfer the
       above cases    for disposal to the competent courts under          his
       jurisdiction. The transferrer courts shall transmit the         record
        and proceedings of the      transferred   cases to the transferee
       court without any delay.
       6.        The transferee court is requested to hear and decide the
       transferred cases as expeditiously    as   may   be   possible.    The
       parties are directed to co-operate with the transferee court in
       expeditious disposal of the case.
       7.        No costs.


       T.P. (Crl. No. 473 of 2012:
                 Although there may be some inconvenience to the petitioner-
       wife but since it is a criminal case, we are satisfied that transfer
       of Case No. 20 of 2006 arising out of F.I.R. No. 252 of 2005, P.S.
       Bindki, District Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh from the court of Chief
       Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur, Uttar Pradesh to the Court of District
       & Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi may create complications
       and inconvenience to the accused.
                 Transfer Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.


                                        ..........................J.
                                        ( R.M. LODHA )




                                        ..........................J.
       NEW DELHI;                       ( SHIVA KIRTI SINGH )
       FEBRUARY 10, 2014.

ITEM NO.51                 COURT NO.2             SECTION XVIA


             S U P R E M E    C O U R T   O F    I N D I A
                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 1421 OF 2012

PRATIMA DEVI                                        Petitioner(s)

                  VERSUS

ANAND PRAKASH                                       Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for stay and office report )
WITH T.P.(C) NO. 1432 of 2012
(With appln(s) for stay and office report )
T.P.(CRL) NO. 473 of 2012
(With appln(s) for stay and office report )

Date: 10/02/2014    These Petitions were called on for hearing today.


CORAM :
          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA
          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH



For Petitioner(s)          Mr. Rajni Kant Avasthi, Adv. for
                        Mr. Harinder Mohan Singh,Adv.



For Respondent(s)          Mr. Ramesh Chandra Mishra,Adv.
                           Dr. Meera Agarwal, Adv.

                           Mr. Ratnakar Dash, Sr. Adv.
                           Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Adv.
                           Mr. Kunal Verma, Adv.

             UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                                 O R D E R

T.P. (C) Nos. 1421 of 2012 and 1432 of 2012:

Transfer Petitions are allowed in terms of signed order.
: 2 :
T.P. (Crl.) No. 473 of 2012:
Transfer Petition is dismissed in terms of signed order.


|(Pardeep Kumar)                            | |(Renu Diwan)                 |
|AR-cum-PS                                  | |Court Master                 |


[SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE]