Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Veerappan vs The Sub Collector (North) on 1 November, 2018

Author: K.Kalyanasundaram

Bench: K.Kalyanasundaram

                                                         1


                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 01.11.2018

                                                       CORAM

                                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM


                                                W.P.No.1258 of 2011
                                                and M.P.No.1 of 2011


                      1. Veerappan
                      2. Ramachandran
                      3. Jayaraman
                      4. Jagadeesan
                      5. Ramraj
                      6. Natarajan
                      7. Arumugam
                      8. Arumugam
                      9. Manohar
                      10. Vinayagamurthy
                      11. Rajamurthy
                      12. Neelaveni
                      13. Balachander
                      14. Maaran
                      15. Mathialagan
                      16. Muthu
                      17. Manoharan
                      18. K.Suguna @ Malarvizhi
                      19. P.Munusamy
                      20. A.Kuppurathinam @ Kuppuraj
                      21. A.Velmurugan
                      22. D.Arumugam
                      23. M.Sakthivel
                      24. M.Adalarasu
                      25. M.Kothandapani
                      26. M.Munusamy


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                               2

                      27. K.Ramalingam
                      28. B.Manivannan
                      29. R.Sadayandi
                      30. N.Tamizh Selvan
                      31. N.Vasu
                      32. K.Munisamy
                      33. Natarajan
                      34. Annadurai                                                    ...   Petitioners


                                                              Vs.


                      1. The Sub Collector (North),
                         Puducherry Union,
                         Puducherry.
                      2. The Tahsildar,
                         Taluk Office,
                         Puducherry.
                      3. P.Thambidurai                                                 ... Respondents

                          [Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed against the
                           3rd respondent, by order of this Court dated, 25.07.2013]



                                  Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                      praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 and 2
                      from evicting the petitioners from the respective premises situated at
                      Pachaivaliyamman Koil Street, Vaithikuppam, Puducherry - 605 012 without due
                      process of law.


                                  For Petitioners      :            M/s.S.Doraisamy

                                  For Respondents      :            Mrs.G.DJEARANY, G.A.(P), for RR1 & 2




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                            3




                                                          ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Puducherry) for respondents 1 and 2 and perused the materials available on record.

2. The petitioners have come forward with this petition for issuance of a Writ of mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from evicting the petitioners from the respective premises situated at Pachaivaliyamman Koil Street, Vaithikuppam, Puducherry without due process of law.

3. According to the petitioners, they are all fishermen and they have been living in Vaithikuppam Village and they were granted patta by the Union Territory of Puducherry. The petitioners would state that during December 2004, Tsunami waves struck Puducherry coast, in which, their residential houses were badly damaged. Hence, for their rehabilitation, the respondent Government had decided to construct permanent houses, by issuing G.O.Ms.No.17, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, dated 13.06.2008, allotting new houses to the Tsunami affected people on condition http://www.judis.nic.in 4 that they should surrender and give possession of their houses, which were affected during Tsunami.

4. It is further stated that the houses constructed under the Tsunami Scheme were not sufficient for the occupation of the family members and it was also far away from the sea-shore. Hence, they made representation and the Government by issuing G.O.Ms.No.35, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, dated 23.11.2009, modified the earlier G.O.Ms.No.17, dated 13.06.2008 and thereby permitting the residents to retain their houses existed before Tsunami.

5. The grievance expressed by the petitioners is that despite the issuance of the above G.Os., the respondents 1 and 2 have visited their place on 07.01.2011 to vacate them from their houses.

6. The second respondent has filed a detailed counter affidavit admitting the issuance of G.O.Ms.No.17, dated 13.06.2008 and the subsequent G.O.Ms.No.35, dated 23.11.2009 and it is further stated that the respondents 1 and 2 have no intention to vacate the petitioners from their premises situated at Pachaivaliyamman Koil Street, Vaithikuppam, Puducherry and if any http://www.judis.nic.in 5 necessity arises in future to vacate the petitioners from their premises, the same would be done by following due process of law.

7. In the light of the above counter affidavit filed by the second respondent, this Court is of the opinion that no further adjudication is required in this Writ Petition. Recording the said counter affidavit, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

01.11.2018 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes Speaking/Non-speaking Order pvs To

1. The Sub Collector (North), Puducherry Union, Puducherry.

2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Puducherry.

http://www.judis.nic.in 6 K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.

pvs W.P.No.1258 of 2011 01.11.2018 http://www.judis.nic.in