Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 6]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Xxx vs The State Of Kerala on 22 November, 2021

Bench: Vineet Saran, Aniruddha Bose

                                                           1

                                                                                      REPORTABLE
                                         IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                          CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1444/2021
          (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No(s).                       5362/2021)


     XXX                                                                        APPELLANT(s)

                                                          VERSUS

     THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.                                                 RESPONDENT(s)




                                                   O R D E R

Leave granted.

An FIR was lodged by the respondent, which was challenged by the appellant by way of a petition filed before the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. By a judgment and order dated 20.04.2021, the High Court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR. Thereafter on 28.04.2021, the High Court took up the matter suo moto and recalled the order dated 20.04.2021. Challenging the same, this appeal by way of special leave petition has been filed.

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record.

Learned counsel for the parties do not dispute the fact that in view of Section 362 Cr.P.C. the Court does not have the power to alter the judgment and order once passed, except to correct the Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by SUNIL KUMAR Date: 2021.11.26 clerical or arithmetical error. In the present case, by a judgment 15:00:48 IST Reason:

and order dated 20.04.2021 FIR had been quashed by the High Court by a detailed reasoned order, which has been recalled by the 2 impugned order dated 28.04.2021. There is no power, except under Section 362 Cr.P.C., which only provides for correction of any clerical or arithmetical error. The same does not empower the court to recall the earlier order passed after contest and that too suo moto.
In view of the aforesaid, we are of the opinion that the impugned order dated 28.04.2021 could not have been passed and the earlier order dated 20.04.2021 has wrongly been recalled by the High Court. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The judgment and order dated 28.04.2021 is set aside.
......................J. [VINEET SARAN] ......................J. [ANIRUDDHA BOSE] NEW DELHI;
NOVEMBER 22, 2021
                                   3

ITEM NO.37      Court 9 (Video Conferencing)               SECTION II-B

                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F       I N D I A
                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)      No(s).    5362/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-04-2021 in CRLMC No. 5866/2020 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) XXX Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.87162/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.87164/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT and IA No.87168/2021-APPLICATION FOR FILING THE PETITION WITHOUT DISCLOSING THE IDENTITY OF THE PETITIONER/RESPONDENT ) Date : 22-11-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajit, Adv.
Mr. Vaibhav Niti, AOR Mr. Abraham Mathan, Adv.
Mr. Justine George, Adv.
Ms. Madhavi Agrawal, Adv.
Mr. Divyanshu Agrawal, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. G. Prakash, AOR Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Adv.
Ms. Beena Prakash, Adv.
Mr. Anand Kalyanakrishnan, Adv. Mr. Vedant Singh, AOR Mr. Vishisht Singh, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted.
The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed reportable order. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of accordingly.
(ARJUN BISHT) (PRADEEP KUMAR) (ASHWANI THAKUR) (COURT MASTER (SH) (BRANCH OFFICER) AR-CUM-PS (Reportable signed order is placed on the file)