Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 25]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Smt. Shalini Saxena vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 February, 2017

                                 WP-828-2017
                (SMT. SHALINI SAXENA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)


14-02-2017

       Shri Nitin Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
       Smt. Nidhi Patankar, learned Govt. Advocate, for the
respondents/State.

Heard on I.A.No.792/17, an application for exemption from filing separate Court fees.

The same is rejected in view of the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court reported in 2011(3) MPJR 59.

Counsel for the petitioner is granted liberty to pay deficit Courts fees within ten days.

Counsel for the petitioner is also directed to file the leave applications of all the petitioners.

List this petition for admission after the Court fee is paid.

(S.A. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE mani