Madhya Pradesh High Court
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Nirbhaysingh on 26 June, 2014
M.Cr.C. No.755/2014 26.06.2014
Shri RS Parmar, learned Panel Lawyer for the applicant/ State.
Heard.
This application for leave to appeal filed against the non- applicant, who was acquitted of the charges leveled against him in Sessions Trial No.12/1989 by Additional Sessions Judge, Ujjain, vide judgment dated 13.09.2013 with respect to the offence alleged against the non-applicant under section 395, 395/397 of IPC.
We have heard the submission made by the learned Panel Lawyer for the applicant/State and have perused the record. We have also gone through the judgment of the trial Court carefully. We find that the reasons for acquittal of the non- applicant in this case basically on account of improper identification of the accused as well as improper identification of the goods allegedly recovered in this case. We can referred to paragraphs 20 and 22, which are reproduced here as under:-
20& vfHk;kstu }kjk tks lk{; izLrqar dh xbZ mleas lcls egRoiw.kZ lk{kh 'ke'kqn~nhu v-lk- 6 gS ftlus iSjk dz- 2 eas Li"V :i ls dgk gS fd vkjksih fuHkZ;flag vk;k] mlus dkyj idM+ yh vksj ?kM+h mrkjh vkSj VkpZ ys fy;k A ml nkSjku mldh xnZu uhps dh vksj >qdh jgh A vkjksih fuHkZ;flag ds gkFk eas MaMk Fkk ckdh yksx D;k fy, Fks mls ugha ekywe A iSjk dz-4 eas lk{kh us dFku fn;k gS fd vkjksih dks igpkuk Fkk ysfdu igpku dh dk;Zokgh dksbZ fo'ks"k egRo ugha j[krh D;ksafd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj fdlh Hkh vkjksih dk gqfy;k izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ eas ntZ ugha gS A vkjksih fuHkZ;flag dh fxjQ~rkjh fnukad 18-01-1989 dks gqbZ vkSj ?kVuk fnukad 5-12-1988 dh gS A tc vkjksih ds gqfy, ds ckjs eas fjiksVZ eas dksbZ mYys[k ugha gS ,slh fLFkfr eas 'ke'kqn~nhu ds eq[;ijh{k.k dk dFku fd mlus vkjksih dks igpkuk Fkk vksj blh us mlds lkFk ?kVuk dh Fkh] fo'luh; izrhr ugha gksrk gS D;ksafd ;g lk{kh vkjksih dks igys ls ugha tkurk Fkk vkSj izfrijh{k.k ds iSjk dz 7 eas lk{kh us ;g Lohdkj dj fy;k gS fd ftls vkjksih us mldh dkyj idMh Fkh mls ,d pDdj Fkkus ij ns[kk Fkk vkSj ,d pDdj HkSjox<+ tsy eas ns[kk Fkk vkSj mls Fkkus eas crk fn;k Fkk fd ;g vkjksih gS ftlus mldh dkyj idM+h Fkh] mlh vkneh dks mlus tsy eas igpkuk Fkk A ,slh fLFkfr eas bl lk{kh ds }kjk tks igpku dh dk;Zokgh dh xbZ gS og egRoghu gks tkrh gS A vc U;k;ky; ds vfHkys[k ij dsoy /kkjk 27 dk eseksjs.Me 'ks"k gS A dsoy /kkjk 27 ds eseksjs.Me ds vk/kkj ij ftleas tIrh ?kVuk ?kfVr gksus ds djhc Ms<+ ekg ckn gqbZ gS] ml vk/kkj ij vkjksih dks nks"kh Bgjkuk eas mfpr ugha le>rk gwa D;ksafd bl laca/k eas ekuuh;
loksZPp U;k;ky us Lokeh fo0 LVsV vkWQ dukzVd ,-vk;-vkj- 2007 ,l-lh-&2531 eas ;g vfHker fn;k x;k gS fd] fu.kZ; nsrs le; lk{; dh foospuk laLohd`fr ls 'kq: ugha gksuh pkfg;s vkSj ,slk Hkh ugha gksuk pkfg;s fd ml laLohd`fr dks lefFkZr djus okyh lk{; ckn eas ryk'k dh tk;s A blds vfrfjDr euh fo0 LVssV vkWQ rfeyukMq ,-vk;-vkj 2007 ,l-lh&1046 eas ;g vfHker fn;k gS fd /kkjk 27 lk{; vf/kfu;e ds vk/kkj ij dh xbZ tCrh detksj lk{; gS vkSj xSj vijk/kksa eas dsoy /kkjk 27 ds eseksjs.Me ,oa tCrh ds vk/kkj ij vkjksih dks nks"kh ugha Bgjk;k tk ldrk A tcfd tCrh ?kVuk ds 10 fnu ckn gqbZ gks A bl izdj.k eas Hkh tCrh ?kVuk ds Ms< ekg ckn gqbZ gS A blds vfrfjDr vkjksih dh f'kuk[rh dh dk;Zokgh Hkh nwf"kr gks xbZ gS A D;ksafd igpku djkus okys O;fDr us igys gh vkjksih dks Fkkus eas ns[k fy;k Fkk vkSj MdSrh dh lEifRr dh igpku dh dk;Zokgh Hkh nwf"kr gks xbZ gS A D;ksafd ml lkeku eas vU; lkeku feyk;k gh ugha x;k] dsoy Qfj;knh dk gh lkeku Fkk A ,slh fLFkfr eas dsoy /kkjk 27 lk{; vf/kfu;e ds eseksjs.Me vkSj tIrh ds vk/kkj ij vkjksih dks nks"kh ugha Bgjk;k tk ldrk tc rd fd vfHkys[k ij vU; dksbZ lk{; u gks A 22& vfHkys[k ij 'ke'kqn~nhu dh lk{; gS ysfdu izfrijh{k.k eas bl lk{kh us bl ckr dks Lohdkj fd;k gS fd igpkuus ls igys mlus vkjksih dks Fkkus ij ns[k fy;k Fkk ,slh fLFkfr eas vU; dksbZ lk{; leFkZu eas ugha gS vkSj tks igpku dh dk;Zokgh gqbZ gS mlds laca/k eas Qfj;knh dkukth v-lk-1 us eq[;ijh{k.k ds iSjk dz-2 eas dFku fn;k gS fd mlus pksjh dk eky rglhynkj ds lkeus igpkuk Fkk] ogka mlh dk lkeku Fkk vU; fdlh dk lkeku ugha Fkk A ,slh fLFkfr eas igpku dh dk;Zokgh Hkh nwf"kr gks tkrh gS A ,slh fLFkfr eas vU; dksbZ lk{; ds vHkko eas eSa vkjksih dks lansg dk ykHk nsrs gq, vkjksih fuHkZ;flag firk nYykth dks Hkk0na0la0 dh /kkjk 395] 395 lg ifBr /kkjk 397 ds varxZr vkjksfir vijk/k ls nks"keqDr djrk gwa A In view of the aforesaid, we find no merits in the application for obtaining leave to file appeal.
Accordingly, the M.Cr.C. is dismissed.
C.c. as per rules.
(Shantanu Kemkar) (M.C. Garg)
Judge Judge
Kratika/