Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Air Force Employees Union Bangalore ... vs Air Head Quarters (Pc/Jcm) on 24 September, 2008

Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri

Bench: Ashok B.Hinchigeri

IN THE HIGH COURT 0;? KARNATAKA AT    ~

DATED was THE 24111 DAY 01-' SEHFEMBEK    

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Asapx E.   

WRIT PETYFION No.1555'? _[(§rI\4.§'-é:"a'--'fi'.:S ] 

BETWEEN:

1

"V * ._SI G{:Li'~.'¥'ET GQPAL H

AIR FORCE EMPLOYEES U1§IIC§P§,  
BANGALORE DISTREQT, (§3EG;NQ.368) 
{AFFILJATED TQ*'BHAR°A'1'HIYA PRATHI   

RAKSHA MAzr><3oR';jsA;~:caH3_ _   V
GANGAMMA =i'cIRC:LE;'JA1.AHga _  ..EAs*'1-', 
BANGALORE-5.60-0:13.    
TO BE Rirfl-V3? '(rs G£2NE'RAL-SESRETARY
SRIG.'}.'HIRUKUMAR  1.  -

R/AT No;,647/1.' AIR .FQRCE=._:  = M
CIVTLIAN QUERTERS;  WEQI'
BANGALORE:§60v01'5_. A   

SR1 <3; TH:RuKu'm.AR V

AGE?) ABOUT 50 YEARS

 JGM W (z.E:m5:1=e; ',

V . BANGALORE-V560 015.

' A:RAFoRc3}3;._¢s*rA*m~N JALAHALLI

R;A'r--.No.64*?;'-- .1 AIR FORCE czvxmn QUARTERS
JAI;AHALL!.W'E.:',"I'

V  PETITIONERS
(BY sax P.A. xmxam. ADVOCATE)

 A' 'AIR HEAD QUARTERS (FC/JOM)
 wnzu mmvma

RAF'! MARG
NEW DELHLI 10 01 1.



2 HEAD QUARTER TRAINING ccmmmo

INDIAN AIR FORCE

BANGALORE-560 006.
3 AIR OFFICER COMMANDING

AIR macs STATTON   

JAIAHALLI 

BANGALORE-560 015.

(BY SMT. LATA PRASA:l§;ICGS{'3}----    ;

THIS WRIT PE'I'I'!'ION IS FELED zzrméiiz ELRTHCLES' Izaeimo 227
0? THE CONSTI'I'U'I'ION op' INDIA. PR.AYI1'£G  QUASH THE ORDER
DT. 8.9.2005 VIDE ANNEXURE~«H I'=AssEp}3§.? i23ee.4§.!JffTI'i()l2i'IY.

THIS WR§'I' PE'I'I'l'I_{}N_ COM'I'RG:1G§I" .12' BIJEIIIER SUBMISSION
THIS DAY. COURT  mLL..;ow;Ne.; *  .. 

Sri  counsel for the petitioners
submits th§:.t..t};,is  hes  become infiuctaous. He
  thaf  iiefifionem' gicvance is over pamgaph

No.13' of   communication}. He submim that the

   submit a representation to the lngh' er

 as  as pep]: No.3 of the hnprugned order is

   Smt. Latha Prasad, learned CGSC for the respondent

that the quesfion of considering the petitioners' representation does not arise at all. HEM.

R:B::31§0:mEN*rs" I

3. I dispose of this petition reserving the %c-xty to to submit appropriate representation vcmilating The xcspondcnt authorities shall consider the ' with its Rules, Regulations and norms. all the contentions are kept open.

4. No order as to costs.

bvr