Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

National Institute Of Construction ... vs The Commissioner Of Cgst, Mumbai on 22 February, 2019

                                                                                                 ADN

                                                   Before: Aniruddha M. Chandekar
                                                   Prothonotary & Senior Master.
                                                   Date: 22nd February, 2019
CALLED OUT FOR REJECTION :
54.   ITXAL/2096/2018 )            Mr. Dinesh Ghugre (Advocate Clerk) I/b. Tejinder
                      )            Singh.
                      )
                      )            P.C.:       The Appellant and/or his/her Advocate to
                      )            remove office objections on the Appeal and to get the
                      )            same numbered and/or registered on or before
                      )            22.03.2019, failing Appeal to stand rejected under the
                      )            provisions of O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance of
                      )            office objections.

58.   CEXAL/236/2018 )             Dhananjay Deshmukh, Advocate for Appellant.
                     )
71.   CEXAL/250/2018 )             P.C.:       The Appellant and/or his/her Advocate to
                     )             remove office objections on the Appeal and to get the
76.   CEXAL/260/2018 )             same numbered and/or registered on or before
                     )             22.03.2019, failing Appeal to stand rejected under the
                     )             provisions of O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance of
                     )             office objections.

63.   CEXAL/242/2018           )   Akshita Bhandari I/b. PDS Legal, Advocate for
      WITH                     )   Appellant.
      NMA/1048/2018            )
      CEXAL/242/2018           )   P.C.:          The Appellant and/or their Advocate to
                               )   remove office objections on the Appeal and to get the
                               )   same numbered and/or registered within four weeks
                               )   after disposal of Notice of Motion for Condonation of
                               )   Delay, failing Appeal to stand rejected under the
                               )   provisions of O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance of
                               )   office objections.

69.   CEXAL/248/2018           )   None present.
      WITH                     )
      NMA/179/2019             )   P.C.:          The Appellant and/or their Advocate to
      CEXAL/248/2018           )   remove office objections on the Appeal and to get the
                               )   same numbered and/or registered within four weeks
                               )   after disposal of Notice of Motion for Condonation of
                               )   Delay, failing Appeal to stand rejected under the
                               )   provisions of O.S. Rule 986 for non-compliance of
                               )   office objections.

22/02/2019

Prothonotary and Senior Master ::: Uploaded on - 25/02/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 21/03/2019 03:01:44 :::