Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

The State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Jai Krishan on 1 July, 2016

Bench: V. Gopala Gowda, Adarsh Kumar Goel

                                                       1

  ITEM NO.41                             COURT NO.9                       SECTION IIB

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

  Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)...... CRLMP                           No(s).
  9444/2016

  (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19/12/2015
  in CRLA No. 366/2006 passed by the High Court Of Himachal Pradesh At
  Shimla)

  STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH                                                   Petitioner(s)

                                                  VERSUS

  JAI KRISHAN AND ORS.                                                        Respondent(s)

  (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP)

  Date : 01/07/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

  CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

  For Petitioner(s)                  Mr. Suryanarayana Singh, Sr. AAG
                                     Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv.

  For Respondent(s)

                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

Issue bailable warrant, returnable by six weeks, Signature Not Verified to the respondents i.e. Jai Krishan, Bihari Lal and Digitally signed by VINOD KUMAR Date: 2016.07.02 13:12:42 IST Reason: Ashok Kumar, for appearance before the learned trial court, against a sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the 2 satisfaction of the arresting officer. Police officer, in-charge of the jurisdiction where the aforesaid respondents reside, is directed to ensure the compliance of the order.

(VINOD KUMAR JHA)                         (SUMAN JAIN)
   COURT MASTER                           COURT MASTER