Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Mahesh Kumar vs Staff Selection Commission on 28 February, 2022

Bench: M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna

     ITEM NO.19                    Court 12 (Video Conferencing)                         SECTION XIV

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F              I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                         No.    1951/2022

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-03-2021
     in WP(C) No. 2994/2021 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New
     Delhi)

     MAHESH KUMAR                                                                  Petitioner(s)

                                                            VERSUS

     STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ANR.                                             Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.17995/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT )

     Date : 28-02-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
                            HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

     For Petitioner(s)                   Mr.    Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv
                                         Mr.    Deepak Goel , Adv
                                         Mr.    Chaman Rana Adv
                                         Ms.    Baby Devi Bonia Adv
     For Respondent(s)

                            UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                               O R D E R

The grievance voiced by the petitioner before the High Court was that certain marks which were deducted ought not to have been deducted. Basically, the issue before the High Court was evaluation of the answer scripts of the petitioner. The High Court has rightly refused to entertain the writ petition by observing that when the conscious decision has been taken by the experts and the courts have no expertise in the matter and academic matters are best left to the academics, we see no reason to interfere with the same. Hence, the Special Leave Petition stands dismissed.

Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by R Natarajan Date: 2022.03.02

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

16:48:04 IST Reason:
     (NEETU SACHDEVA)                                                            (NISHA TRIPATHI)
     COURT MASTER (SH)                                                            BRANCH OFFICER