Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 3]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Smt. Aarti Datta (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Smt. ... vs Jagat Pratap Singh (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Smt. ... on 29 August, 2022

Author: Atul Sreedharan

Bench: Atul Sreedharan

                                                                1
                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                      AT JABALPUR
                                                         SA No. 969 of 2020
                          (SMT. AARTI DATTA (DEAD) THR. LRS. SMT. BENU SEN AND OTHERS Vs JAGAT PRATAP SINGH (DEAD)
                                                   THR. LRS. SMT. GAYATRI DEVI AND OTHERS)

                          Dated : 29-08-2022
                                 Mr.S.K.Bakshi, learned counsel for the appellants.

                                 Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the connected appeal the
                          S.A.No.522/2020 has been admitted and the substantial questions of law have
                          been drawn up vide order dated 9.12.2020, which would be the same in this
                          appeal also.

                                 Under the circumstances, in view of order dated 9.12.2020 in the
                          connected appeal, the S.A.No.522/2020 the same are adopted as substantial
                          questions of law also and they are as follows :


                                 "1. Whether, the learned Courts grossly erred in not framing an issue in
                          respect of the proof of will as required in accordance with Section 63 of the
                          Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act,
                          on the basis of which the title of the plaintiffs rests?
                                 2. Whether the findings of the learned Courts below based on the

                          demarcation report submitted and on the evidence of the Revenue Inspector are
                          perverse and unsustainable?
                                 3 . Whether the learned Courts below grossly erred in placing reliance on
                          the faulty demarcation report, which marks the Khasra Numbers in a haphazard
                          manner and in violation of the demarcation rules?"

                                 Issue notice to the respondents on payment of process fee within 10

days by both modes. The notices be made returnable within 8 weeks.

Signature Not Verified Signed by: SHYAMLEE SINGH SOLANKI Signing time: 8/30/2022 2:55:47 PM 2

Till the next date of hearing status quo shall be maintained by the parties. List this case on 3.11.2022.

(ATUL SREEDHARAN) JUDGE ss Signature Not Verified Signed by: SHYAMLEE SINGH SOLANKI Signing time: 8/30/2022 2:55:47 PM