Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 9]

Chattisgarh High Court

Vinod Kumar Agrawal vs State Of Chhattisgarh 64 Wpc/1521/2018 ... on 18 June, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                                      1

                                                                                      NAFR

                         HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                           WPC No. 1520 of 2018

                   Vinod Kumar Agrawal, S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal Agrawal, aged about 53
                   years, R/o Near Ram Temple, Sakti, Police Station - Sakti, District Janjgir
                   Champa (C.G.)                                           ---- Petitioner

                                                   Versus

                1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Housing and
                   Environment, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Raipur (C.G.)

                2. The State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Department of Urban
                   Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Raipur (C.G.)

                3. The Chief Executive Officer, Raipur Development Authority, District Raipur
                   (C.G.)

                4. The Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

                5. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
                                                                              ---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate.

For State : Mr. R. N. Pusty, G. A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 18/06/18

1. Mr. Ashish Shrivastava and Mr. R.N. Pusty, learned counsel appearing for respective respondents on instruction would submit that the final allotment letter will be issued to the petitioners within a period of one year from today.

2. The aforesaid statement is taken on record.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid statement made by the respective respondents. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka