Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Sofila vs The District Educational Officer on 20 March, 2019

Author: R.Mahadevan

Bench: R.Mahadevan

                                                  1

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                         DATED: 20.03.2019

                                              CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

                                       W.P(MD)No.4696 of 2019
                                                and
                                      W.M.P.(MD)No.3746 of 2019

            R.Sofila                                                 ... Petitioner
                                                 Vs.

            1.The District Educational Officer,
              Tuticorin @ Pudukottai,
              Titucorin District-628 103.
              (Previously called as District Elementary
                  Educational Officer)

            2.The Block Educational Officer,
              Srivaikundam Union,
              Tuticorin District.

            3.The Correspondent,
              St.Mary's Middle School,
              Palayakayal,
              Tuticorin District.                                    ... Respondents

            PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of
            India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records
            relating to the        impugned Staff-Fixation for the    academic year
            2017-2018 issued by the 1st respondent herein in proceedings No.Nil,
            dated Nill, and subsequent impugned proceedings issued by the second
            respondent herein vide O.Mu.No.964/A1/2018, dated 23.11.2018, quash
            the same and further direct the respondents herein to approve the
            appointment of petitioner as Secondary Grade Teacher in the third
            respondent school, w.e.f., 24.07.2018 and disburse grant-in-aid towards
            salary and other attendant benefits.
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                          2

                               For Petitioner        :Mr.A.Ajith Geethan
                               For R1 and R2         :Mrs.S.Srimathy,
                                                      Special Government Pleader

                                                     ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the impugned proceedings issued by the respondent authorities and consequently, directing the respondent authorities to approve forthwith the appointment of the petitioner as Secondary Grade Teacher with effect from the date of her appointment and other consequential relief.

2.It is the case of the petitioner that the 3rd respondent School is a recognised Government Aided Minority Educational Institution, wherein the post of Secondary Grade Teacher fell vacant on account of the retirement of the incumbent one A.Salbine on 30.06.2018. In that vacancy, the petitioner was appointed as Secondary Grade Teacher on 24.07.2018. Thereafter, the 3rd respondent School submitted a proposal to the first respondent through the 2nd respondent on 31.10.2018, requesting to approve the appointment of the petitioner as Secondary Grade Teacher and disburse grant-in-aid towards her salary. However, the second respondent, vide impugned proceedings dated 23.11.2018, returned the said proposal on the ground that there are surplus posts in http://www.judis.nic.in 3 the said School, as per staff-fixation made by the first respondent for the academic year 2017-18. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition for the aforesaid relief.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the approval sought for is only for the sanctioned staff strength and therefore, there is no surplus Teacher in the 3rd respondent School. The learned counsel also submitted that a Division Bench of this Court has dealt with the very same issue in 2018 (1) Writ L.R 421 [the Director of Elementary Education and others Vs. the Correspondent].

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that as per the Government Order in G.O(Ms)No.525, School Education (D1) Department, dated 29.12.1997, it is only for the Director of Elementary Education to redeploy the staff from one School to another and that the respondent School cannot redeploy them on its own.

5.The learned Special Government Pleader brought to the notice of this Court that there are surplus teachers in the 3 rd respondent school and the same is not adhered to by the Management. http://www.judis.nic.in 4

6.In such view of the matter, the impugned proceedings dated 23.11.2018 issued by the second respondent is set aside. The respondent authorities are directed to grant approval for appointment of the petitioner as Secondary Grade Teacher in the 3rd respondent school, at the earliest. As and when the approval is granted, considering the surplus strength, deployment order is to be given forthwith by the Management with immediate effect.

7.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.




                                                                         20.03.2019
            Index              : Yes/No
            Internet           : Yes/No
            cmr

            To

            1.The District Educational Officer,
              Tuticorin @ Pudukottai,
              Titucorin District-628 103.

(Previously called as District Elementary Educational Officer)

2.The Block Educational Officer, Srivaikundam Union, Tuticorin District.

http://www.judis.nic.in 5 R.MAHADEVAN, J.

cmr/rk W.P(MD)Nos.4696 of 2019 20.03.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in