Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Hemlata vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 6 March, 2018

Author: Rajiv Narain Raina

Bench: Rajiv Narain Raina

                                          1
CWP No.24280 of 2017;
CWP No.24414 of 2017 &
CWP No.24279 of 2017


       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                        CHANDIGARH

                                          Date of decision: 06.03.2018

                                          CWP No.24280 of 2017

Hemlata                                                     ...Petitioner

                                    Vs.

State of Haryana & another                                  ...Respondents

                                          CWP No.24414 of 2017

Sunita Devi                                                 ...Petitioner

                                    Vs.

State of Haryana & others                                   ...Respondents

                                          CWP No.24279 of 2017

Rahul Yadav                                                 ...Petitioner

                                    Vs.

State of Haryana & others                                   ...Respondents



CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA

Present:      Mr. Jangvir S. Hooda, Advocate,
              for the petitioner in CWP No.24280 of 2017.

              Mr. R.S.Dhull, Advocate, for
              Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advocate,
              for the petitioner in CWP No.24414 of 2017.

              Mr. Himanshu Rao, Advocate,
              for the petitioner in CWP No.24279 of 2017.

              Ms. Shruti Jain Goyal, AAG, Haryana.

RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J. (ORAL)

This order will dispose of the aforementioned three writ petitions, as the cause they espouse and the factual and legal issue involved 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 10-03-2018 23:27:59 ::: 2 CWP No.24280 of 2017;

CWP No.24414 of 2017 & CWP No.24279 of 2017 is common and identical and, therefore, they can be conveniently decided by a single order.

These petitions have been filed by Dependents of Ex- servicemen claiming right to be called for interview for the post of Clerk. Petitioners in CWP No.24280 of 2017 and CWP No.24414 of 2017, namely, Hemlata and Sunita Devi respectively have applied under the DESM (General) category, while petitioner in CWP No.24279 of 2017, namely, Rahul Yadav applied under the DESM (BC-B) category.

Learned Law Officer points out that there are sufficient number of Ex-servicemen available for filling the advertised vacancies and they have to be considered first. It is only in case one or more of them fall out of consideration from Ex-servicemen category, then a Dependent of Ex- servicemen has a right to be considered. The cut-off for ESM(General) category is 88 marks, while Hemlata (petitioner in CWP No.24280 of 2017) has secured 100 marks and Sunita Devi (petitioner in CWP No.24414 of 2017) has secured 102 marks. Similarly, cut-off for ESM (BC-B) category is 56 marks, while Rahul Yadav (petitioner in CWP No.24279 of 2017) has secured 76 marks.

In view of the factual position explained above, all the petitions are disposed of with a direction to the Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Haryana, Panchkula that in case there are available vacancies in the aforesaid category, then the cases of the petitioners will be considered strictly as per merit in the selection process. In that eventuality, the Commission will ensure that the petitioners are dealt with fairly and they will not be needlessly compelled to knock the door of this Court by a 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 10-03-2018 23:28:00 ::: 3 CWP No.24280 of 2017;

CWP No.24414 of 2017 & CWP No.24279 of 2017 patently bad decision and justice will be done to them by the Commission in accordance with law, failing which on imposition of exemplary costs.



06.03.2018                                        [RAJIV NARAIN RAINA]
Vimal                                                    JUDGE


              Whether speaking/reasoned:               Yes
              Whether Reportable:                      No




                                3 of 3
             ::: Downloaded on - 10-03-2018 23:28:00 :::