Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Jayakumar vs Smt.Seethamma on 20 August, 2014

Author: Anand Byrareddy

Bench: Anand Byrareddy

                             1




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
                     BANGALORE

       DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014

                          BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

        WRIT PETITION No.38180 of 2014 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

Sri. Jayakumar,
Son of Late Puttegowda,
Aged about 46 years,
Retired Employee,
Residing at No.262,
K.H.Ranganatha Colony,
Opposite to BHEL,
Mysore Road,
Bangalore - 560 026.
                                    ...PETITIONER

(By Shri. K.P.Bhuvan, Advocate)

AND:

1.     Smt. Seethamma,
       Aged about 59 years,
       Wife of Krishnappa,
       Residing at No.261,
       K.H.Ranganatha Colony,
       Opposite to BHEL,
       Mysore Road,
                                   2




      Bangalore - 560 026.

2.    The Executive Engineer,
      Chandra Layout Sub-Division,
      Ward No.41, Good Shed Road,
      Bangalore Metropolitan Corporation,
      Bangalore - 560 054.

3.    The Commissioner,
      Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike,
      Bangalore - 560 001.

                                      ...RESPONDENTS
                             *****
      This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of
the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned order
dated 5.6.2014 in O.S.No.9580/2005 passed on the applications
[I.A.No.6] under Order 26 Rule 9 read with Section 151 of
CPC, on the file of the Court of XL Additional City Civil and
Sessions Judge, Bangalore vide Annexure-G and thereby
dismissed the application.

       This Writ Petition is coming on for Preliminary Hearing
this day, the court made the following:


                          ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the court to withdraw the petition.

3

2. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

JUDGE KS