Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 74]

Karnataka High Court

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S Ibc Knowledge Park Pvt Ltd on 15 March, 2010

Bench: K.L.Manjunath, H.S.Kempanna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

..i'3..,...1*3'1..,.".,7.V13.2..T:3...1S...1.

1.

.e...........................

DATED THIS THE 15'?" DAY OF' MARCH, 

: PRESENT :

TI-IE I-ION'BLE MIR. JUsTIcE__K,,L_._   ,  A  1'

AND

THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE   1.

1.7.5.;No.4Q2e:sf.2'00§ A

The COI{1Ei1iS'S_i0I1f3I
C.R.B1_1fl_dir;7gg',_. _ * _
Queehs Ro.'»ici',3l.__ »  _ 
Bangaiore.1".;__ _   A

'I"-he Assistant'»C'o;:3:iI21issioner of Income Tax,
Circles-V11   
Banga.10re."-  

 V' .   Appellants

 "  {ByA:$';i*i.?£i;V":Aravii:d';"fer Sri.M.V.Seshachala, Advocate)

        

O'  Knowledge Park Pvt. Ltd.,

" Sheriff Centre,

N'Q__..'t' 3 / 1, 59' Floor,

 A St.Marks Road,
 ffiangalore.

 Respondent

=i=****=!= 52:"

l\.} This l'l'A is filed U/S 260A of the Income Tax.-Act. 1961, praying to allow the appeal and set aside the order passed by the lncome Tax Appellate '1*"1"ib1i'na},4 Bangalore Bench, in CO.No.100/Bang/2OQ8'"'{ln--.._:lj"lA_'=_ NO.l079/Bang/2008) Dated 27.02.2009 aT.1.d.C0_Iifi1"ml_"

the order passed by the Assistant Coinmissionjerjjof '» Income Tax, Circle - 11(4), Banga'1ore*.» '_ This ITA coming on foitg €)1jderst,.b»_tA.tilis'~ it Manjunath J ., delivered thefollowing: V V JWWWWU D G This appeal is 2.009 in an incomplete forrri; were not complied belore the Court on 2091 Jar1u£i»L"'-it two Weeks' time was granted'.-_ are not complied with as t}1ejj't.im~el 'stipulated, the matter is again before 'Court today. Till today, there is no pcom_p'lia;nce». ofy_o'£fice objections. V2. _ . the circumstances, We do not see any 'justificattion to grant an adjournment to comply the with jl."the,_office objections, when the appellants have failed to es"

comply with the same. Accordingly, the appeai'--is dismissed for new prosecution.

V

BMV*    V