Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Than Singh vs Praveen Gupta on 2 July, 2019

Bench: Sangeet Lodha, Vinit Kumar Mathur

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
                  D.B. Writ Contempt No. 993/2018

Than Singh S/o Inder Singh, aged about 38 Years, By Caste
Rajput R/o Village Dharbala Ki Dhani, Tehsil Siwana, District
Barmer.
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.      Praveen      Gupta,     Secretary,        Department        of   Revenue,
        Government of Rajasthan.
2.      Shri Shiv Prakash Nakate, District Collector, Barmer.
3.      Shri Kalu Ram, Tehsildar, Siwana, District Barmer.
4.      State   of    Rajasthan         through         Secretary     Department
        Revenue Govt. of Raj. Jaipur.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Moti Singh.
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. L.K. Purohit, AGC.

                                 Mr. Himanshu Gupta,
                                 District Collector, Barmer.



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 02/07/2019 This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging disobedience of order dated 27 th of February, 2018 passed by this Court in DBCWP No.14935/2016.

Vide aforesaid order, the respondents were directed to remove the encroachment, if any, in Khasa No.200 of Village Dharbala, Tehsil Siwana, District Barmer, within a period of three months after providing opportunity of hearing to the persons, who are in occupation and possession illegally. (Downloaded on 02/07/2019 at 10:21:56 PM)

(2 of 2) [WCP-993/2018] Reply to contempt petition has been filed on behalf of respondents taking stand that all encroachments over the disputed land have been removed.

This factual position is not disputed by the counsel appearing for the petitioner.

In view of compliance made, we are not inclined to proceed with contempt proceedings any further.

Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are dropped. Notices are discharged.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (SANGEET LODHA),J 10-DJ/-

(Downloaded on 02/07/2019 at 10:21:56 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)