Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai

Pioneer Food And Agro Industries, ... vs Ito 18(3)(2) (Presently, Acit-22(2)), ... on 23 May, 2018

               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                          "SMC" BENCH, MUMBAI
          BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
         SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER


                          ITA no.1454/Mum/2018
                        (Assessment Year :2008-09)


Pioneer Food And Agro Industries
Krishna Kunj, 4A/3B, 1st Floor
Banke Bihari Society
                                                      ................ Appellant
8th Road, Pali Hill
Khar West, Mumbai 400 052
PAN - AAJFP0506D

                                   v/s

Income Tax Officer
                                                     ................ Respondent
Ward-18(3)(2), Mumbai

                        Assessee by : Ms. Mrugakshi K. Joshi
                        Revenue by : Ms. N. Hemalatha

Date of Hearing - 23.05.2018                Date of Order - 23.05.2018


                                ORDER

PERSAKTIJIT DEY, J.M. Aforesaid appeal by the assessee is against order dated 26th December 2017, passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals)-33, Mumbai, for the assessment year 2008-09.

2. The only issue in dispute in the present appeal relates to disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act") amounting to ` 16,86,621, 2 Pioneer Food And Agro Industries representing the profit received from duty drawback, VKUY license and exchange difference.

3. The Assessing Officer relying upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Liberty India Ltd. v/s CIT, [2009] 183 Taxman 349 (SC) held that, since, such income / profit do not form part of profit derived from eligible industrial undertaking, claim of deduction under section 80IB of the Act in respect of such income cannot be allowed.

4. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) also sustained such disallowance.

5. The learned Authorised Representative fairly submitted before us that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of M/s. Liberty India Ltd. (supra) has decided the issue against the assessee and following the said decision the Tribunal in assessee's own case for assessment year 2009-10 and 2010-11 has decided the issue against the assessee. A copy of the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench in ITA no.6088 and 6089/Mum./2013, dated 20th June 2016, was placed before the Bench.

6. The learned Departmental Representative agreed with the aforesaid submissions of the assessee.

3

Pioneer Food And Agro Industries

7. We have heard the parties and perused the materials on record. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions made before us as well as the ratio laid down in the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Liberty India Ltd. (supra) and the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench in assessee's own case cited supra, we uphold the order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) by dismissing the ground raised.

8. In the result, assessee's appeal is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 23.05.2018 Sd/- Sd/-

  MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL                                   SAKTIJIT DEY
   ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                                   JUDICIAL MEMBER



MUMBAI,     DATED: 23.05.2018


Copy of the order forwarded to:

(1)   The Assessee;
(2)   The Revenue;
(3)   The CIT(A);
(4)   The CIT, Mumbai City concerned;
(5)   The DR, ITAT, Mumbai;
(6)   Guard file.
                                                  True Copy
                                                  By Order
Pradeep J. Chowdhury
Sr. Private Secretary


                                             (Sr. Private Secretary)
                                                 ITAT, Mumbai