Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Rohini Kishor Nayak Since Minor Thr Her ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another on 9 February, 2026

2026:BHC-AUG:6101-DB
                                                 (1)
                                                               18- W.P. 1435-2026.odt
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            18 WRIT PETITION NO. 1435 OF 2026

                       Rohini D/o Kishor Nayak,
                       Age : 17 Years, Occ. Education,
                       Since minor through her guardian father
                       Kishor Pratapsing Nayak,
                       Age : 48 years, Occ. Private Job,
                       r/o. Rawala, Taluka Soygaon,
                       Dist. Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar.        ..Petitioner

                                  VERSUS

                1.     The State of Maharashtra,
                       Through Secretary,
                       Tribal Development Department,
                       Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

                2.     The Scheduled Tribes Certificate
                       Scrutiny Committee, Chhatrapati
                       Sambhajinagar,
                       Through its Member Secretary.

                                                ...
                Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak D. Choudhari
                AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya
                                               ...

                                  CORAM :      SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                               ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.

                                  DATED :      FEBRUARY 09, 2026

                ORAL ORDER (PER ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J):-

1. Heard.

2. The tribe claim of the petitioner of belonging to "Naikda" Scheduled Tribe is pending before the respondent No.2/Scrutiny Committee for verification since 14.07.2025. (2)

18- W.P. 1435-2026.odt

3. Considering the fact that the petitioner is desirous of prosecuting his higher studies, we direct the respondent No.2/tribe committee to decide the tribe claim of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and preferably by the end of June 2026.

4. With these directions, the present Writ Petition stands disposed of.




(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE)                      (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
      JUDGE                                   JUDGE




YSK/