Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Rajendraprasad Tejuprasad Rajbhar vs The State Of Maharashtra on 9 March, 2022

Author: Prakash D. Naik

Bench: Prakash D. Naik

                                                                                        4. Ba-322-2022.doc




                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                           CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 322 OF 2022

                        Rajendraprasad Tejuprasad Rajbhar                          ...Applicant
                              Versus
                        The State Of Maharashtra                                  ...Respondent
                                                        ....
                        Mr. Saumitra Salunke i/by P. R. Yadav, Advocate for the Applicant.
                        Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent - State.

                                                   CORAM       :        PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
                                                   DATE        :        9th MARCH, 2022.

                        PER COURT:

                        1.                   The applicant is permitted to delete prayer clause (a).

                        The application has been amended in accordance with order dated

                        1st March, 2022 and prayer clause (aa) has been added to this

                        application with prayer to release the applicant on temporary bail

                        for a period of six months on medical ground.

                        2.                   The applicant is arrested on 20th May, 2019 in

                        connection with C.R. No.179 of 2019 registered with Sahar Police

                        Station, Mumbai for offence under Section 376(2)(f)(i) of Indian

                        Penal Code (for short "IPC") and Sections 4 & 8 of the Protection of

                        Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short 'POCSO Act').

                        3.                   The previous application preferred by the applicant

                        has been rejected by this Court by order dated 9 th March, 2020.

                        The said application however rejected on merits.
           Digitally
           signed by
           SAJAKALI
SAJAKALI   LIYAKAT
LIYAKAT    JAMADAR
JAMADAR    Date:        Sajakali Jamadar                           1 of 8
           2022.03.11
           17:48:16
           +0530
                                                              4. Ba-322-2022.doc




4.                 The applicant had preferred an application on medical

ground before the Court of Sessions which has been rejected by

order dated 21st February, 2022.

5.                 The applicant has urged that, while in custody the

applicant has suffered paralytic attack.          He was admitted in

J.J.Hospital and was subsequently discharged.                The health

condition of the applicant is deteriorating. Hence, for the purpose

of adequate treatment, the applicant be released on temporary bail.

6.                 This application was listed before the regular Court.

However, by order dated 21 st February, 2022, the regular Court had

directed that the matter may be placed before the regular Court in

view of previous order rejecting the application for bail.

7.                 Since it was urged that the applicant had suffered

paralytic attack and he has been admitted in J.J. Hospital, by order

dated 1st March, 2022, the applicant was permitted to amend this

application and add requisite amendment and also annex the order

dated 21st February, 2022 passed by the Sessions Court rejecting the

application for bail on medical ground. The Court also called for

report from Mumbai Central Prison as well as J.J. Hospital.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order the report from Mumbai Central

Prison and J.J. Hospital was received by this Court.



Sajakali Jamadar                      2 of 8
                                                             4. Ba-322-2022.doc




8.                 Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the

medical reports fortifies the fact that the health condition of the

applicant is not good.         He had suffered paralytic attack.       The

applicant is in custody from 20th May, 2019. Considering the health

condition of the applicant, adequate treatment is required to be

provided to him on account of the atmosphere in the jail. The

applicant would not be in position to get proper treatment and

recovery from the ailment from which he is suffering.


9.                 Learned APP submitted that, adequate treatment is

being provided to the applicant in jail. The report of J.J. Hospital

indicate that the applicant was treated in the Neurology

Department from 07-02-2022 to 12-02-2022. He was discharged

on 12-02-2022 and at the time of discharge she was stable

clinically. It is further submitted that the medical report submitted

by the Chief Medical Officer, Mumbai Central Prison, Mumbai also

refers to the present health status of the applicant and it has been

stated that general condition of the applicant is moderate. Hence,

in the light of this report, it is submitted that the case for grant of

bail on temporary ground is not made out.


10.                It is noted that the applicant had preferred an

application for bail on medical ground before the Court of Sessions

Sajakali Jamadar                     3 of 8
                                                           4. Ba-322-2022.doc




which has been rejected by order dated 21 st February, 2022. The

order indicates that the learned counsel for the applicant had urged

before the Sessions Court that the applicant had suffered with

paralysis attack in February, 2022. In the absence of any supportive

documents as to how the concerned had gathered the information

that the accused suffered with paralytic attack is not clear.

According to the prosecution the jailer had not conveyed about the

said fact. It it not possible to consider the prayer for bail without

document. Thus, it is apparent that the learned Sessions Judge was

not appraised about ailment of the applicant with supportive

documents. The Medical report which are produced before this

Court were not placed for consideration before the Sessions Court.

11.                I have perused the medical report dated 07-03-2022

and 05-03-2022. the report dated 07-03-2022 has submitted by

the Medical Officer, J. J. Hospital. In compliance with the order

passed by this Court, the report includes the letter dated 7 th March,

2022 issued by the Neurology Department of J. J. Hospital to the

Medical Superintendent, J. J. Hospital, Mumbai indicating that the

applicant was treated as indoor patient and the report about his

treatment is enclosed. The letter dated 07-03-2022 issued by the

Neurology Department to the Medical Superintendent, J.J. Hospital



Sajakali Jamadar                     4 of 8
                                                                          4. Ba-322-2022.doc




mentioned as follows :-

                      "As per case history papers, Mr. Rajendraprasad
                   Tejuprasad Rajbhar is a 58 yr old male, Prisoner from
                   Arthur Road Jail B/B PC No 141409 came with complaints
                   of, left sided weakness with type 2 diabetes mellitus and
                   hypertension.
                      He was admitted at Sir J.J. Hospital in ward 23 under
                   Neurology from 07/02/2022 to 12/02/2022 with a
                   diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke due to lacunar infarct.

                     On admission he had pulse rate: 86 bpm, BP: 160/80
                   mm hg.

                       Clinical examination revealed left sided hemiplegia and
                   left UMN type facial palsy with dysarthria. Left sided
                   upper + lower limb power was 0/5 and right sided power
                   was 5/5. He was confined to bed with indwelling catheter.

                       Investigations revealed random blood sugar of 258mg/
                   dl,    Creatinine-    1.0mg/dl,   urea-    16.5    mg/dl,
                   SGOT-24.3U/L, SGPT-22.2 U/L, total bilirubin - 0.3 mg%.

                   USG abdomen showed           mild    prostatomegaly    and
                   Fundoscopy was normal.

                      CT brain done on 07/02/2022 revealed extensive small
                   vessel ischemic changes with no e/o bleed. CT brain
                   angiography showed no major vessel occlusion.

                      He was diagnosed with lacunar stroke and treated with
                   antiplatelets- Tablet-Ecosprin and Tablet-Clopidogrel,
                   Statin- Tablet-Atrovastatin, antihypertensive- Tablet-
                   Telmisartan and antidiabetic- Tablet -Metformin.
                   Physiotherapy given.

                      Appointment for MRI Brain stroke protocol was taken
                   for 22/02/2022 for further characterization of the lesion.
                   Patient was discharged on 12/02/2022. At the time of
                   discharge, he was stable clinically with pulse rate: 82bpm,
                   BP: 146/90 mm hg, but was bed bound with no
                   improvement in his left sided power."


12.                   The report also enclosed the discharge summary of the

applicant issued by J. J. Hospital stating that the applicant was


Sajakali Jamadar                             5 of 8
                                                           4. Ba-322-2022.doc




admitted on 07-02-2022 and discharged on 12-02-2022.                  The

history referred to therein mentions that there was sudden onset

weakness of left side of body since evening 7 p.m. associated with

facial deviation to right side and slurred speech. Patient was

apparently alright till 7 p.m. today when he developed sudden

onset weakness in left upper limb and lower limb. It was maximum

at the onset and non progressive causing inability to hold objects

stand and walk. He also C/O slurred speech with facial deviation

to right side. Diagnosis were left hemiplegia secondary to acute

ishemic stroke newly detected hypertension and diabetes mellitus.

The medical case papers also refers to the treatment given to him.

13.                The report dated 05-03-2022 issued by the Chief

Medical Officer, Mumbai Central Prision, Mumbai refers to the

illness of the applicant and the present complaint viz. Left sided

weakness, facial deviation to right side, giddiness, tendency to fall,

slurred speech. The medical advice provided to physiotherpy along

with stric adherence to medicines, salt restricted and diabetic diet.

The report also refers to present health status of patient that history

is being provided medicine as prescribed from Sir J. J. Hospital. He

is bed ridden at present with weakness over left side of body with

facial deviation to right side. His blood sugar level and blood



Sajakali Jamadar                   6 of 8
                                                                4. Ba-322-2022.doc




pressure is deranged in spite of taking regular medicines. His

general condition is moderate.

14.                Both the reports are taken on record and marked as 'X'

& 'X-1' for identifications. Although the report of Chief Medical

Officer, Mumbai Central Prison, Mumbai indicates that, general

condition of the patient is moderate, it is undisputed that the

applicant is bed ridden with weakness over left side of body with

facial deviation to right side

15.                In the light of the observations made in both the

reports, it would be appropriate that the applicant is granted

temporary bail for a period of six months to enable him to take

appropriate treatment in healthy atmosphere.

16.                Hence, I pass the following order:

                                    ORDER

i. Criminal Bail Application No. 322 of 2022 is allowed;

ii. The applicant is directed to be released on bail in connection with C.R. No.179 of 2019 registered with Sahar Police Station, Mumbai for a period of six months from the date of release on medical ground on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount;

iii. The applicant is permitted to furnish cash bail in the sum of Rs.25,000/- for a period of ten weeks in lieu of surety.

Sajakali Jamadar                       7 of 8
                                                                 4. Ba-322-2022.doc




            iv.     The applicant shall not approach the victim in any
            manner.

            v.      The applicant shall not stay in the vicinity of the
            residence of the victim.

            vi.     The applicant and/or other relatives of the applicant

shall not pressurize the victim or in any other witnesses.

vii. On completion of the period of six months, the applicant shall surrender to jail.

viii. Bail Application stands disposed of accordingly.





                                             (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)




Sajakali Jamadar                        8 of 8