Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Sri Utpal Ganguly vs Sri Tapan Kumar Mondal & Ors on 14 June, 2018

Author: Rajasekhar Mantha

Bench: Rajasekhar Mantha

                                                1


10   14.06.2018                        CPAN 441 of 2018
AN   Ct. No. 14
                                            with
                                      WP 4781(W) of 2003
                                            with
                                      WP 15159(W) of 2003
                                            with
                                      WP 11181(W) of 2001

                                             Sri Utpal Ganguly
                                                    -vs.-
                                      Sri Tapan Kumar Mondal & ors.


                  Mr. Dhiman Kr. Sengupta
                                                         ... for the petitioner
                                                      (in WP 4781(W) of 2003)

                  Mr. Milan Kr. Bhattacharjee
                  Mrs. Sulagna Bhattachaya
                                                         ... for the respondent

(in WP 4781(W) of 2003) ... for the petitioner (in WP 15159(W) of 2003) (in WP 11181(W) of 2001) Having heard the learned counsel for the Parties, let the contempt application alongwith the other three writ applications stand adjourned and appear in the Supplementary List of 07.08.2018 for further hearing. Let the CAN application connected thereto appear alongwith these matters on the same date.

In the meantime, in view of the order of status quo already passed, let there be no construction either external or internal in the premises in question. Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel disputes that there has been any such construction at all.

(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.) 2