Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -3 vs Fujitsu India Private Limited on 7 February, 2022

Author: Rajiv Shakdher

Bench: Rajiv Shakdher, Talwant Singh

                            $~13-15
                            *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                            +    ITA 34/2019
                                 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3..... Appellant
                                                Through: Ms. Mansie Jain, Advocate.
                                                versus
                                 FUJITSU INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED             ..... Respondent
                                                Through: Mr. Shashwat Bajpai, Advocate.

                            +      ITA 224/2019
                                   THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3 ..... Appellant
                                                Through: Ms. Mansie Jain, Advocate.

                                                  versus
                                   FUJITSU INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED            ..... Respondent
                                                  Through: Mr. Shashwat Bajpai, Advocate.

                            +      ITA 243/2019
                                   THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -3 ..... Appellant
                                                  Through: Ms. Mansie Jain, Advocate
                                                  versus
                                   FUJITSU INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED             ..... Respondent
                                                  Through: Mr. Shashwat Bajpai, Advocate.

                                   CORAM:
                                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
                                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
                                           ORDER

% 07.02.2022 [Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19]

1. An adjournment slip has been moved in the above-captioned matters on behalf of the petitioner/revenue on the ground that the counsel-on-record i.e., Mr Shlok Chandra has taken ill.

2. The request is not opposed by Mr Shashwat Bajpai, who appears on ITA 34/2019 & connected Page 1 of 2 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETI KUMARI SHARMA Signing Date:10.02.2022 15:09:12 behalf of the respondent/assessee.

3. At request, list the matter on 09.09.2022, albeit, at the end of the board, in the category of "After Notice Miscellaneous Matters".

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J TALWANT SINGH, J FEBRUARY 7, 2022/mr Click here to check corrigendum, if any ITA 34/2019 & connected Page2 of 2 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETI KUMARI SHARMA Signing Date:10.02.2022 15:09:12