Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Mukul Nandi vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 28 September, 2022

Author: Rajasekhar Mantha

Bench: Rajasekhar Mantha

28-09-2022
 ct no. 13
  Sl.27
    sp

                            WPA 20733 of 2022
                              Mukul Nandi
                              -Versus-
                   The State of West Bengal & Ors.

             Mrs. Nandini Mitra,
             Mr. Syed Shahid Imran,
             Mr. Sakya Maity,
             Ms. Saika Khan
                                                         ...for the petitioner

             Mr. Santanu Kumar Mitra, ld. Sr. Govt. Adv.
             Mr. Subhabrata Das
                                                ...for the State

             Mr. Sumit Kr. Panja,
             Mr. Sunit Roy
                                                     ...for the WBSEDCL



                   The      writ     petitioner     is    a   whistleblower

             contractor    engaged       by   the    WBSEDCL        in   the

             Bardhaman area.

                   He     had      complained of alleged         corruption

             against      one      Md.   Sohel       Hassan,      Divisional

             Manager/Engineer, and Sk. Samad, a contractor.

             Acts of corruption are alleged against the Executive

             Engineer and one Sk. Samad who has facilitated the

             corruption. The petitioner is stated to have been

             severely assaulted with an attempt to murder him.

                   As many as three FIRs have been registered.

             Two of such FIRs have resulted in charge sheets.

             Further investigation into one of such charge sheets
                          2




has been directed by the ACJM concerned. The third

FIR resulted in an FRT.

      The Bardhaman Police Station shall file a

detailed report before this Court in respect of the

three charge sheets except one, that is already

pending    consideration     before   the   Jurisdictional

Magistrate, where further investigation has been

ordered.

      The Court notices that the concurrence and

cooperation   of   the   WBSEDCL       is   vital   for    the

investigation by the Bardhaman Police into the FIR,

which is pending consideration after re-investigation

before the Jurisdictional Magistrate.

      For the aforesaid purpose and to facilitate the

same, the petitioner shall prepare and submit a

comprehensive and detail complaint/representation

to the Chief Vigilance Officer, WBSEDCL, and to the

I.C., Burdwan P.S. within a period of 7 days from the

date of receipt of a copy of this order.

      The Chief Vigilance Officer, WBSEDCL shall

submit an unbiased, transparent and detailed report

before this Court on the adjourned date with prior

service to the petitioner and the Officer-in-Charge,

Bardhaman Sadar Police Station within 2 weeks to

the petitioner's complaint as above. The                  Chief

Vigilance Officer shall also render all assistance to

the   Officer-in-Charge,     Bardhaman      Sadar     Police
                         3




Station to conduct the investigation into the pending

FIR.

       If necessary, the Bardhaman Police Station

may at their discretion also register further FIR based

on the representation of the petitioner and the report

of the Chief Vigilance Officer, WBSEDCL.

       Let this matter stand adjourned and be listed

on December 7, 2022.

       The   report    of   the   Inspector-in-Charge,

Burdwan Police Station, Purba Bardhaman, dated

20.09.2022

, addressed to the State advocate, is kept with the record.

List the matter accordingly.

(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)