Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune

Vintage Enterprises, Raigad vs Acit Cir Panvel, Panvel on 21 February, 2020

          IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                   PUNE BENCH "B", PUNE

           BEFORE SHRI George Mathan, Judicial Member and
               Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Accountant Member

                        Stay Petition No. 06/PUN/2020
                   Arising out of I.T.A. No. 3469/MUM/2016
                         Assessment Year: 2008-09


M/s. Vintage Enterprises
Shop No. 01, Patel Paradise
Plot No. 01, 31 & 32, Sector 35(E)
Owe - Kharghar
Navi Mumbai - 410 210

PAN; AAFFV 5688 J                                   Applicant

Vs.

The Dy. CIT Panvel Circle, Panvel                   Respondent


                    Appellant by:  Shri M. Subramanian
                    Respondent by: Shri Deepak Garg
                    Date of hearing:          21-02-2020
                    Date of Pronouncement:    21-02-2020


                                     ORDER


PER GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

This stay petition is filed by the assessee arising out of I.T.A. No. 3469/MUM/2016 for A.Y. 2008-09.

2. Shri M. Subramanian is represented for the assessee and Shri Deepak Garg is represented for the Revenue.

3. It was submitted by the learned A.R that the total demand in the present case was an amount of Rs. 1,49,06,370/-. The assessee has paid an amount 2 Stay Petition No. 06 of 2020 (ITA No. 3469/MUM/2016) A.Y. 2008-09 Vintage Enterprises of Rs. 41,00,000/- and the balance of Rs. 1,08,06,370/- is outstanding payment. It was his submission that the issue in the appeal is in relation to the sale of land at Nevali village. It was his submission that the Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 16,93,90,000 as cash consideration and Rs. 3,90,90,000/- as cheque consideration. It was his submission that consequently a substantial demand has been raised on the assessee which came to be reduced on appeal before the CIT(A). As against the income assessed at Rs. 20,84,80,000/-, in appeal before the CIT(A) the total income was reduced to Rs. 5,26,00,000/-. It was his submission that the assessee has substantially a strong case in appeal. It was also his submission that the assessee had been granted stay of recovery of disputed taxes on two earlier occasions in Stay Petition No. 5/PUN/2019 dated 1-2-2019 and in Stay Petition No. 46/PUN/2019 dated 5-8- 2019. It was his prayer that the assessee be granted stay of recovery of the disputed taxes.

4. In reply, the learned D.R vehemently opposed the stay petition. It was his submission that the assessee has already been granted stay of recovery of the disputed taxes for more than 365 days. It was his submission that the petition is liable to be dismissed. It was his submission that if at all, the assessee may be granted installments.

5. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material on record. Considering the facts in the present case and without going into the merits of the impugned addition, it is noted that at the outset, the assessee has not shown any financial difficulties in respect of the payment of disputed taxes. However, in the interest of justice, it is directed that the assessee be granted installment scheme of Rs. 5,00,000/- p.m. The first installment is to be paid on 3 Stay Petition No. 06 of 2020 (ITA No. 3469/MUM/2016) A.Y. 2008-09 Vintage Enterprises or before 15th March 2020 and subsequent installment on or before 15th of every succeeding month. The assessee shall not seek any adjournment on the next date of hearing. If the assessee seeks adjournment on the next date of hearing, the installments scheme granted to the assessee shall stand vacated automatically.

4. In the result, the stay petition is partly allowed.

Order pronounced in open Court on this 21st day of February 2020.

          Sd/-                                         sd/-
(ANIL CHATURVEDI)                                 (GEORGE MATHAN)
Accountant Member                                 Judicial Member

Pune; Dated : 21st February 2020.
Ankam


Copy of the Order is forwarded to :

1.    Assessee
2.    Respondent
3.    The CIT(A) 2 Thane
4.    The Pr. CIT 2 Thane
5.    The Assessing Officer
6.    The D.R. ITAT Pune Bench 'B'
7.    Guard file

      True copy


                                                  By order


                                             Sr. Private Secretary
                                             ITAT Pune Bench, Pune
                                 4           Stay Petition No. 06 of 2020
                                             (ITA No. 3469/MUM/2016)
                                                           A.Y. 2008-09
                                                    Vintage Enterprises



1    Draft dictated on                21.02.2020     Sr. PS/PS
2    Draft placed before author       21.02.2020     Sr. PS/PS
3    Draft proposed and placed
     before the second Member
4    Draft discussed/approved by
     second Member
5    Approved draft comes to the Sr. 21-02-2020      Sr. PS/PS
     PS/PS
6    Kept for pronouncement on                       Sr. PS/PS
7    Date of uploading of order                      Sr. PS/PS
8    File sent to Bench Clerk         21-02-2020     Sr. PS/PS

9    Date on which the file goes to
     the Head Clerk
10   Date on which file goes to the
     A.R
11   Date of dispatch of order