Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Chandrashekhar vs State Of U.P. on 9 August, 2010

Author: Arvind Kumar Tripathi

Bench: Arvind Kumar Tripathi

Court No. - 51

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20836 of 2010

Petitioner :- Chandrashekhar
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
Petitioner Counsel :- Sameer Jain
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Tripathi,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the prosecutrix was major and according to injury report there was no mark of injury on any part of the body. She her self went along with the applicant and it appears that she was a consenting party. However, the applicant is in jail since 24.4.2010.

In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on merit, it is a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Chandrashekhar be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in Case Crime No.121 of 2010 under Section 363, 366, 376 I.P.C. PS. Manduadih, District Varanasi.

Order Date :- 9.8.2010 Rk